Your message dated Wed, 10 Dec 2014 21:41:26 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#772753: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: --status says: 
15.0.0.239, adobe says: 16.0.0.235, chrome has: 16.0.0.235
has caused the Debian Bug report #772753,
regarding pepperflashplugin-nonfree: --status says: 15.0.0.239, adobe says: 
16.0.0.235, chrome has: 16.0.0.235
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
772753: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772753
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pepperflashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1.4~bpo60+1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

I request severity important due to ongoing flash security concerns.

# update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree --status
p11-kit: invalid config filename, will be ignored in the future:
/etc/pkcs11/modules/gnome-keyring-module
Flash Player version installed on this system  : 15.0.0.239
Flash Player version available on upstream site: 15.0.0.239

# At http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/
Linux   Mozilla, Firefox - NPAPI (Extended Support Release) 11.2.202.425
        Chrome (embedded), Chromium-based browsers - PPAPI  16.0.0.235

Note that google-chrome-stable 39.0.2171.95-1 reports that it is using
16.0.0.235

As an aside, I had a similar issue on my Windows-8 system where both
PPAPI 15.0.0.239 and 16.0.0.235 were simultaneously installed.  I had to
completely uninstall Adobe flash, reboot, and reinstall Adobe flash to
cleanup the mess there.

Thanks,
Jeffrey Sheinberg

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.7
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.16-0.bpo.3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages pepperflashplugin-nonfree depends on:
ii  binutils               2.22-8
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.49
ii  gnupg                  1.4.12-7+deb7u6
ii  libatk1.0-0            2.4.0-2
ii  libcairo2              1.12.2-3
ii  libcurl3-gnutls        7.26.0-1+wheezy11
ii  libfontconfig1         2.9.0-7.1
ii  libfreetype6           2.4.9-1.1
ii  libgcc1                1:4.7.2-5
ii  libglib2.0-0           2.33.12+really2.32.4-5
ii  libgtk2.0-0            2.24.10-2
ii  libnspr4               2:4.10.2-1~bpo70+1
pn  libnss3                <none>
ii  libpango1.0-0          1.30.0-1
ii  libstdc++6             4.7.2-5
ii  libx11-6               2:1.5.0-1+deb7u1
ii  libxext6               2:1.3.1-2+deb7u1
ii  libxt6                 1:1.1.3-1+deb7u1
ii  wget                   1.13.4-3+deb7u2

pepperflashplugin-nonfree recommends no packages.

Versions of packages pepperflashplugin-nonfree suggests:
ii  chromium                   37.0.2062.120-1~deb7u1
pn  hal                        <none>
ii  ttf-dejavu                 2.33-3
ii  ttf-mscorefonts-installer  3.4+nmu1
ii  ttf-xfree86-nonfree        4.2.1-3.1

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:35:11PM -0500, Jeffrey Sheinberg wrote:
> Version: 1.4~bpo60+1

Please note that
http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/#index6h2
states this :

  |  Report Bugs
  |  
  |  Please report bugs that you found in the packages to the backports 
mailinglist
  |  and NOT to the Debian BTS!

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to