Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:08:59 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.8.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2002 09:02:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 05 04:02:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zensunni.demon.nl [212.238.195.120] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 174HuZ-0000OY-00; Sun, 05 May 2002 04:02:31 -0500
Received: from ray by zensunni.demon.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 174HuU-000509-00; Sun, 05 May 2002 11:02:26 +0200
Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 11:02:25 +0200
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: irssi: /whois feature request
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Organization: Ray at home
X-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.0, kernel 2.4.19-pre7-ac4
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: irssi
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-05
Severity: wishlist
irssi has some nice features for dealing with multiple IRC networks, like
/connect -IRCNET tagname
/join -tagname #channel
which allow the user to think in terms of IRC networks, rather than
individual servers. Unfortunately, the /whois command still requires an
explicit server name. It would be nice if it could support tags as well,
e.g.
/whois -OPN fnord
would do a
/whois [the server I'm currently CONNECTed to that has the OPN tag]
fnord
Ray
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zensunni 2.4.19-pre7-ac4 #1 Fri May 3 07:54:08 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1
--
Obsig: developing a new sig
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 145864-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2005 08:09:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 15 00:09:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from light.bluelinux.co.uk ([193.201.200.221] ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EmoAe-0000LV-QP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:09:00 -0800
Received: from light.bluelinux.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by light.bluelinux.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF523E5B332
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:08:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by light.bluelinux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 2042)
id BEB83E5B333; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:08:59 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:08:59 +0000
From: David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in 0.8.10
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This is fixed in 0.8.10, so closing
--
David Pashley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
