Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:22:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308295: fixed in drbd 0.7.10-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 08:07:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 01:07:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dns2.cdlan.net (relay.cdlan.net) [217.171.33.253] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DV3IK-0002a2-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 01:07:16 -0700
Received: from luca (unknown [217.171.42.6])
        by relay.cdlan.net (Postfix) with SMTP
        id 2EA33205F; Mon,  9 May 2005 10:06:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 2145 invoked by uid 10050);
        Mon, 09 May 2005 08:06:44 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Luca Corti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Missing dependency on dpatch
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 10:06:44 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: drbd0.7-module-source
Severity: important



On sarge, after upgrade to 0.7.10-3 building the module source via make-kpkg 
fails like
this:



make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-686-smp'
/usr/bin/make    \
                                ARCH=i386 prepare
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-686-smp'
  SPLIT   include/linux/autoconf.h -> include/config/*
  CHK     include/asm-i386/asm_offsets.h
  UPD     include/asm-i386/asm_offsets.h
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-686-smp'
echo done >  stamp-kernel-configure
echo done >  stamp-configure
for module in /usr/src/modules/drbd ; do                       \
          if test -d  $module; then                                \
    (cd $module;                                          \
              if ./debian/rules KVERS="2.6.8-2-686-smp" KSRC="/usr/src/linux" \
                             KMAINT="Unknown Kernel Package Maintainer"
KEMAIL="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"      \
                             KPKG_DEST_DIR="/usr/src/linux/.."       \
                             KPKG_MAINTAINER="Unknown Kernel Package Maintainer"
\
                             KPKG_EXTRAV_ARG=""        \
                             ARCH="i386"                  \
                             KDREV="10.00.Custom" kdist_image; then    \
                  echo "Module $module processed fine";            \
              else                                                  \
                   echo "Module $module failed.";                  \
                   if [ "X" != "X" ]; then      \
                      echo "Perhaps $module does not understand --rootcmd?";  \
                      echo "If you see messages that indicate that it is not"; \
                      echo "in fact being built as root, please file a bug ";  \
                      echo "against $module.";                     \
                   fi;                                              \
                   echo "Hit return to Continue";                   \
         read ans;                                        \
              fi;                                                   \
     );                                                    \
  else                                                      \
               echo "Module $module does not exist";               \
               echo "Hit return to Continue?";                      \
  fi;                                                       \
        done
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/drbd'
./debian/rules:12: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/drbd'
Module /usr/src/modules/drbd failed.
Hit return to Continue




I solved it installing dpatch, which wasn't needed in -2, so i think there's a
missing dependency on dpatch.


thanks


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308295-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 05:32:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 16 21:32:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EnUWD-00081S-Ua; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:22:05 -0800
From: Cyril Bouthors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.17 $
Subject: Bug#308295: fixed in drbd 0.7.10-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:22:05 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: drbd
Source-Version: 0.7.10-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
drbd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

drbd0.7-module-source_0.7.10-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/drbd/drbd0.7-module-source_0.7.10-4_all.deb
drbd0.7-utils_0.7.10-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/drbd/drbd0.7-utils_0.7.10-4_i386.deb
drbd_0.7.10-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/drbd/drbd_0.7.10-4.diff.gz
drbd_0.7.10-4.dsc
  to pool/main/d/drbd/drbd_0.7.10-4.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Cyril Bouthors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated drbd package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:42:20 +0200
Source: drbd
Binary: drbd0.7-module-source drbd0.7-utils
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.7.10-4
Distribution: stable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Cyril Bouthors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 drbd0.7-module-source - RAID 1 over tcp/ip for Linux module source
 drbd0.7-utils - RAID 1 over tcp/ip for Linux utilities
Closes: 308295 319537
Changes: 
 drbd (0.7.10-4) stable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added dep to dpatch (closes: #319537, #308295).
Files: 
 6c083dce8cbb6564608fab11a42d10ba 716 admin extra drbd_0.7.10-4.dsc
 e6741a90471de603b9eb3e6765a4c5f0 10683 admin extra drbd_0.7.10-4.diff.gz
 97dfe30a8f49fccd0474a69dc7459191 81564 admin extra 
drbd0.7-utils_0.7.10-4_i386.deb
 7b78a5233cbfd4a04755e9cd75ebbdda 132492 admin extra 
drbd0.7-module-source_0.7.10-4_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC4jt3Z1SJHeqsYt8RAtrPAJ46qi/txqd6fdIgnPHy8LPPADhr+QCfajQH
eD4ockkRakBOoRDCx58z5eU=
=R7ii
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to