Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:22:59 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309651: fixed in firehol 1.231-2sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 15:00:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 08:00:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from box.vrn.ru [195.98.64.73] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DYQ21-0005G9-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 08:00:22 -0700
X-AVP-Status: Drweb on box.vrn.ru tested = Ok
Received: from [195.98.65.47] (HELO localhost)
  by box.vrn.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 221929664 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:00:17 
+0400
Received: from thand by localhost with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DYQ1z-0002td-3T
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:00:19 +0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alexander Sitnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: firehol don't remove lock file while stoping
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 19:00:19 +0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: firehol
Version: 1.231-2
Severity: normal

When calling `invoke-rc.d firehol stop` don't remove lock file
/var/lock/firehol. After that `invoke-rc.d firehol stop` fails.
`invoke-rc.d firehol restart` works fine.
# invoke-rc.d firehol stop
Stopping iptables firewall: FireHOL ...FireHOL: Clearing Firewall: OK

done.
# ls /var/lock/firehol 
/var/lock/firehol
# invoke-rc.d firehol start
Starting iptables firewall: FireHOL ...Stopping: FireHOL is already
running.
done.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-ck8alex
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages firehol depends on:
ii  bash                          2.05b-26   The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii  bc                            1.06-15    The GNU bc arbitrary precision cal
ii  iproute                       20041019-3 Professional tools to control the 
ii  iptables                      1.2.11-8   Linux kernel 2.4+ iptables adminis
ii  net-tools                     1.60-10    The NET-3 networking toolkit

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 309651-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 05:35:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 16 21:35:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EnUX5-00085P-OO; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:22:59 -0800
From: Alexander Wirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.17 $
Subject: Bug#309651: fixed in firehol 1.231-2sarge1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:22:59 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: firehol
Source-Version: 1.231-2sarge1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
firehol, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

firehol_1.231-2sarge1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/firehol/firehol_1.231-2sarge1.diff.gz
firehol_1.231-2sarge1.dsc
  to pool/main/f/firehol/firehol_1.231-2sarge1.dsc
firehol_1.231-2sarge1_all.deb
  to pool/main/f/firehol/firehol_1.231-2sarge1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Wirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated firehol package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:27:52 +0200
Source: firehol
Binary: firehol
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.231-2sarge1
Distribution: stable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Alexander Wirt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 firehol    - An easy to use but powerful iptables stateful firewall
Closes: 309651 315399
Changes: 
 firehol (1.231-2sarge1) stable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed lockfile deletion (Closes: #315399,#309651)
     Backported fix from unstable for sarge r1
Files: 
 42ceedc465cfebf98bbf341528b95a96 590 net optional firehol_1.231-2sarge1.dsc
 fdd98e2599a94567cd212404f16d9382 8362 net optional 
firehol_1.231-2sarge1.diff.gz
 fc4a2ff127ca8d3fdedda7ec06cd1fb7 160262 net optional 
firehol_1.231-2sarge1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDXeFI01u8mbx9AgoRAhoZAKCac9ggRNZFnBdzfos5uibRBL9iOQCeOMQl
QcJmbq3PaS8v4b/RAxVvegw=
=jkya
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to