Your message dated Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:22:19 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325215: fixed in squirrelmail 2:1.4.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2005 21:11:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 26 14:11:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 200-127-57-176.cab.prima.net.ar (gownok.linux-lab.com.ar) 
[200.127.57.176] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E8lU0-0005kz-00; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:11:28 -0700
Received: from rrt by gownok.linux-lab.com.ar with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1E8lYf-0001eC-Io
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:16:17 -0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ezequiel Larrarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: squirrelmail: file handle
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 18:16:17 -0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: squirrelmail
Version: 2:1.4.4-6sarge1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Squirrelmail version 1.4.4 does not parse attached files very well.
I attach three files to a mail, then the recipient receives two files.

I saw the mail source and the files are in, but two of them are merged,
so i see two files, one with incorrect filesize.

send:
file1 2k
file2 2k
file3 2k

receive:
file1 4k --- file1 is merged with file2
file3 2k

Squirrelmail version 1.4.5 solved out the problem!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.31-router
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages squirrelmail depends on:
ii  apache-ssl [httpd]      1.3.33-6         versatile, high-performance HTTP s
pi  apache2-mpm-prefork [ht 2.0.54-4         traditional model for Apache2
pi  libapache2-mod-php4     4:4.3.10-15      server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  perl                    5.8.4-8          Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  squirrelmail-locales    1.4.4-20050308-1 Translations for the SquirrelMail 

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 325215-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 07:23:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 16 23:23:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EnWOZ-00075T-AQ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:22:19 -0800
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.17 $
Subject: Bug#325215: fixed in squirrelmail 2:1.4.4-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:22:19 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: squirrelmail
Source-Version: 2:1.4.4-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
squirrelmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

squirrelmail_1.4.4-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/squirrelmail/squirrelmail_1.4.4-7.diff.gz
squirrelmail_1.4.4-7.dsc
  to pool/main/s/squirrelmail/squirrelmail_1.4.4-7.dsc
squirrelmail_1.4.4-7_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/squirrelmail/squirrelmail_1.4.4-7_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated squirrelmail 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 03:01:54 +0200
Source: squirrelmail
Binary: squirrelmail
Architecture: source all
Version: 2:1.4.4-7
Distribution: stable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 squirrelmail - Webmail for nuts
Closes: 325215
Changes: 
 squirrelmail (2:1.4.4-7) stable; urgency=low
 .
   * Work around changed behaviour in PHP's chunk_split() function, which may
     cause multiple attachments in outgoing mail to end up being sent
     corrupted, without any feedback or error message to the sender.
     (Closes: #325215)
Files: 
 0aed711cfb956c7e13343d0112377acf 742 web optional squirrelmail_1.4.4-7.dsc
 5cee20a2cb42eecc29670c6e041498e8 23817 web optional 
squirrelmail_1.4.4-7.diff.gz
 cd3561371c06311e16d943568c7adf54 570102 web optional 
squirrelmail_1.4.4-7_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Signed by Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

iD8DBQFDFCt3l2uISwgTVp8RApFKAJ9CCZ/+3Nnt/eR4ay3YaPKKtn1UgACgnoPR
xpg3lS9w+wemKrDYbZG94Dw=
=5lVC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to