Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:31:20 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310091: gsl-bin: cannot compile, previous definition
problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2005 15:07:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 21 08:07:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.telefonica.net (tnetsmtp1.mail.isp) [213.4.129.135]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZVZl-00063R-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 08:07:41 -0700
Received: from khazad.dudu ([80.25.143.197]) by
tnetsmtp1.mail.isp (terra.es) with ESMTP id IGUI0Q00.DC4 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 21 May 2005 17:07:38 +0200
Subject: gsl-bin: cannot compile, previous definition problem
From: Eduardo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cerme=F1o?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:26:53 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gsl-bin
Severity: normal
I'm trying to use lush (lisp universal shell), I write (load
"libnum/linalgebra") and get the following error:
In file included from /home/hook/.lush/packages/gsl/C/gsl_idx.c:223:
/usr/include/gsl/gsl_wavelet.h:39: redefinition of `forward'
/usr/include/gsl/gsl_fft.h:39: `forward' previously defined here
/usr/include/gsl/gsl_wavelet.h:40: redefinition of `backward'
/usr/include/gsl/gsl_fft.h:40: `backward' previously defined here
Well, I have installed gsl-1.0 from fonts and I get this error no more,
one thing I have noticed is that there is no wavelet directory in
version 1.6.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=3D3Des_ES, LC_CTYPE=3D3Des_ES
--=20
Eduardo Cerme=F1o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 310091-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 21:31:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 13:31:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.85])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Enjen-0007p5-T5
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:31:57 -0800
Received: from basebud.nulle.part
(c-67-174-11-185.hsd1.il.comcast.net[67.174.11.185])
by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP
id <20051217213121014008ii9ie>; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:31:27 +0000
Received: from edd by basebud.nulle.part with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1EnjeC-0007gu-Fz; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:31:20 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:31:20 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#310091: gsl-bin: cannot compile, previous definition problem
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On 23 May 2005 at 10:38, Brian Gough wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
| > CCing this upstream to Brian just in case I am overlooking something
| > obvious.
|
| There is a known bug in GSL that the fft and wavelet headers cannot be
| used together in the same file due to a conflicting enum definition.
| Any packages using both will need to work around it (e.g. separating
| the wavelet/fft use into different files).
Being a documented upstream feature, it doesn't really make sense to mark
this in Debian's BTS so I am closing this. Should this gravely upset you, or
anybody else listening in, then please feel free to re-open at a low
priority.
Regards, Dirk
--
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
-- Thomas A. Edison
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
