Your message dated Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:36:44 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#783494: mirror listing update for ftp.fau.de
has caused the Debian Bug report #783494,
regarding mirror listing update for ftp.fau.de
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
783494: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783494
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mirrors
Severity: minor
Submission-Type: update
Site: ftp.fau.de
Aliases: ftp.uni-erlangen.de
Type: leaf
Archive-architecture: ALL amd64 armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-amd64
kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390x sparc
Archive-ftp: /debian/
Archive-http: /debian/
Archive-rsync: debian/
Backports-ftp: /debian-backports/
Backports-http: /debian-backports/
Backports-rsync: debian-backports/
CDImage-ftp: /debian-cd/
CDImage-http: /debian-cd/
CDImage-rsync: debian-cd/
IPv6: yes
Archive-upstream: ftp1.de.debian.org
Backports-upstream: ftp.de.debian.org
CDImage-upstream: ftp.de.debian.org
Updates: four
Maintainer: rrze-ftp-admins <[email protected]>
Country: DE Germany
Location: Erlangen
Sponsor: Friedrich-Alexander-Universität http://www.fau.de
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Michael,
On 04/28/2015 03:36 AM, Michael Meier (FTP Admin) wrote:
> The submission form stated:
> Archive-architecture: ALL amd64 armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 kfreebsd-amd64
> kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390x sparc
> When checking the indices on your mirror however, all architectures were
> listed. As such I sought confirmation of which was correct. Some mirrors
> do drop architectures.
> Yeah I realized that when I reread the message. However "ALL" is the
> keyword here, and actually the only checkbox we ticked manually. The
> mirror submission form then automatically selects all the individual
> architectures it has. However, in the list on the mirror submission
> form, arm64, ia64, ppc64el and s390 are missing; probably because they
> are not supported by the current debian release, only by older releases.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
>> There is an unofficial listing of mirrors that serve https (that needs
>> updating), though at this time there is no plan to publish an official
>> listing or direction push as there are so few mirrors that provide the
>> service. We have had a few discussions on the topic in the
>> #debian-mirrors channel on IRC.
> Though this discussion is a little off-topic here, my 2 cents are that
> the fact that only few mirrors offer this service is not an argument not
> to list it in the official list. On the contrary, if it would be listed,
> more mirror admins could get the idea that this is a service worth offering.
>
You are talking to the person in favor of the https support. :) But this
is not the place for a longer discussion, join us on IRC or via email to
the mirrors-list and speak with the other admins. Perhaps you can
convince them or they can convince you.
Your mirror entry has been updated as requested.
Thank you for your continued support, and for mirroring Debian!
Best regards,
Donald Norwood
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
