Your message dated Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:15:25 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#786595: transition: x265
has caused the Debian Bug report #786595,
regarding transition: x265
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
786595: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786595
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x265.html
libx265 bumped its SONAME from libx265-51 to libx265-59 and requires a
transition. All four reverse dependencies build fine against the new version.
Since all reverse dependencies are also involved in the x264 transition, I'd
suggest to do x265 at the same time as x264.
Cheers
Ben file:
title = "x265";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libx265-51" | .depends ~ "libx265-59";
is_good = .depends ~ "libx265-59";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libx265-51";
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 23/05/15 15:05, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2015-05-23 14:45:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 23/05/15 13:19, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: [email protected]
>>> Usertags: transition
>>> Control: forwarded -1
>>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x265.html
>>>
>>> libx265 bumped its SONAME from libx265-51 to libx265-59 and requires a
>>> transition. All four reverse dependencies build fine against the new
>>> version.
>>> Since all reverse dependencies are also involved in the x264 transition, I'd
>>> suggest to do x265 at the same time as x264.
>>
>> Let's do this.
>
> Thanks, uploaded.
This is finished now.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
