Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:24:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line See info
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2002 13:53:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 19 07:53:49 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.wootsoft.com [213.225.54.26]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18E8p2-0002zs-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:53:49 -0600
Received: from fwe.wootsoft.com ([213.225.54.27] helo=greebo.wootsoft.lan)
by mail.wootsoft.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18E8q9-0001T9-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:54:57 +0100
Received: from alfie by greebo.wootsoft.lan with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18E8of-0004GA-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:53:25 +0100
From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: shellutils: basename is not mentioned in dirname, and visa versa
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:53:25 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Scanner: exiscan *18E8q9-0001T9-00*9Wtoak8pCxs* (Wootsoft Entertainment)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: shellutils
Version: 2.0.11-11
Severity: minor
Hi!
The program dirname should be mentioned in the manual page for
basename, and the other way round. It is not good that they are not
cross referenced, they do mostly the same and one might just know the
one but not the other and look for information about doing the inverse
in that man pages....
Please, add them to the SEE ALSO section of the other, thanks in
advance.
So long,
Alfie
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 169745-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2005 23:24:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 15:24:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-out3.tiscali.nl ([195.241.79.178])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EpZnQ-0006A2-15
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:24:28 -0800
Received: from [82.171.132.56] (helo=82-171-132-56.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl)
by smtp-out3.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl)
id 1EpZnO-0004y1-Pf
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:24:27 +0100
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by 82-171-132-56.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A4AC00D3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:24:18 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:24:17 +0100
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: See info
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
In the coreutils info:
* File name manipulation:: dirname basename pathchk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
