Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:14:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line udev initramfs split done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 20:52:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 08 12:52:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from qix.demiurgestudios.com ([12.151.131.245])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkSkE-0005pH-3w
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:52:02 -0800
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mole.internal.demiurgestudios.com)
by qix.demiurgestudios.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1EkSkC-0000XU-00; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:52:00 -0500
Received: by mole.internal.demiurgestudios.com (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 7DD60C3A00; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:51:58 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andrew Moise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Duplicate files in initramfs-tools and udev when upgrading both
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:51:57 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.42
Severity: normal
I don't know whether this is because of initramfs-tools or udev,
or both, but when I upgraded them together they hit a spot of trouble:
Preparing to replace udev 0.076-4 (using .../archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement udev ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev', which is also in
package initramfs-tools
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Preparing to replace initramfs-tools 0.40 (using
.../initramfs-tools_0.42_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement initramfs-tools ...
...
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.076-5_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Some errors occurred while unpacking. I'm going to configure the
packages that were installed. This may result in duplicate errors
or errors caused by missing dependencies. This is OK, only the errors
above this message are important. Please fix them and run [I]nstall again
Press enter to continue.
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of initramfs-tools:
initramfs-tools depends on udev (>= 0.076-5); however:
Version of udev on system is 0.076-4.
dpkg: error processing initramfs-tools (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
...
Errors were encountered while processing:
initramfs-tools
installation script returned error exit status 100.
Press <enter> to continue.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages initramfs-tools depends on:
ii busybox 1:1.01-3 Tiny utilities for small and embed
ii cpio 2.6-9 GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii klibc-utils 1.1.1-4 small statically-linked utilities
ii udev 0.076-5 /dev/ and hotplug management daemo
initramfs-tools recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 342601-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 15:21:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 07:21:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at ([213.239.196.228])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EpojD-000285-7W
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:21:07 -0800
Received: from nancy (nancy.ai.wu-wien.ac.at [137.208.51.175])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B91D5C00B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:15:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from max by nancy with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1Epmks-0001yw-2J
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:14:42 +0100
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:14:42 +0100
From: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: udev initramfs split done
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 0.42
Newer udev has an replaces that takes care of such troubles,
thus allows it to overwrite this file.
closing therefor.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
