Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:29:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344541: /etc/modprobe.d/libsane syntax wrong?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 16:12:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 08:12:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from v320-146-lb.lb.its.uwo.ca ([129.100.74.146] helo=uwo.ca)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EppWT-0001Sq-5w
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:12:01 -0800
Received: from groucho.mail.uwo.pri (brutus.mail.uwo.pri [172.29.32.39])
 by groucho.mail.uwo.pri
 (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.01 (built Nov 22 2005))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:11:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([129.100.75.77])
 by groucho.mail.uwo.pri (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.01 (built Nov
 22 2005)) with ESMTPS id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:11:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from jdc by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EppVw-0003aM-BH     for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 
11:11:28 -0500
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:11:28 -0500
From: Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /etc/modprobe.d/libsane syntax wrong?
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libsane
Version: 1.0.17-1
Severity: minor

I frequently get the following log messages:

Dec 22 10:09:16 localhost modprobe: WARNING: /etc/modprobe.d/libsane line 1: 
ignoring bad line starting with 'blacklist' 

The file in question contains:

blacklist scanner
blacklist hpusbscsi

I'm using the stable versions of module-init-tools (3.2-pre1-2)
and hotplug (0.0.20040329-22).

Is this just a case of libsane needing a newer version of 
module-init-tools?  If so, should libsane declare a versioned
dependency?

Dan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libsane depends on:
ii  adduser              3.63                Add and remove users and groups
ii  libc6                2.3.5-9             GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgphoto2-2         2.1.6-6             gphoto2 digital camera library
ii  libgphoto2-port0     2.1.6-6             gphoto2 digital camera port librar
ii  libieee1284-3        0.2.10-1            cross-platform library for paralle
ii  libjpeg62            6b-10               The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libusb-0.1-4         2:0.1.10a-9.sarge.1 userspace USB programming library
ii  makedev              2.3.1-77            creates device files in /dev

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 344541-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 16:29:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 08:29:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from frigate.technologeek.org ([62.4.21.148] ident=postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EppnZ-0002su-8D
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:29:41 -0800
Received: by frigate.technologeek.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id D2A811465647; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:29:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#344541: /etc/modprobe.d/libsane syntax wrong?
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:29:03 +0100
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Dan Christensen's
        message of "Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:11:28 -0500")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.18 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi,

> Dec 22 10:09:16 localhost modprobe: WARNING: /etc/modprobe.d/libsane line 1: 
> ignoring bad line starting with 'blacklist' 

> I'm using the stable versions of module-init-tools (3.2-pre1-2)
> and hotplug (0.0.20040329-22).
>
> Is this just a case of libsane needing a newer version of 
> module-init-tools?  If so, should libsane declare a versioned
> dependency?

Yes, and no. You're using a mixed stable/testing/unstable system, so
well, that's the kind of things you have to deal with :)

JB.

-- 
 Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 
 Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 
 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to