Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:11:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line <readline/rltypedefs.h>, info documentation: semantics of
return value of rl_ function types not documented
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2001 20:57:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 13 15:57:15 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns.hegbloom.net (bittersweet.intra.hegbloom.net) [63.105.27.231]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15sVqM-0003hg-00; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 15:57:15 -0500
Received: from bittersweet.intra.hegbloom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bittersweet.intra.hegbloom.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with ESMTP
id f9DKvDNh001793;
Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:57:13 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bittersweet.intra.hegbloom.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) id
f9DKvDcQ001792;
Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:57:13 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Karl M. Hegbloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libreadline4-dev: <readline/rltypedefs.h>, info documentation:
semantics of return value of rl_ function types not documented
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.31
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.31
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:57:13 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libreadline4-dev
Version: 4.2-5
Severity: normal
I could not find documented anywhere the semantics of the int return
value for the readline function typedefs found in <readline/rltypedefs.h>.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bittersweet 2.4.9vp6 #1 SMP Sun Sep 2 14:47:13 PDT 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libreadline4-dev depends on:
ii libncurses5-dev 5.2.20010318-3 Developer's libraries and docs for
ii libreadline4 4.2-5 GNU readline and history libraries
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 115500-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 22:11:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 14:11:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Epv8b-0006o2-5M
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:11:45 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA02323
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:11:42 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80202F2B1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:11:42 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 13395-15 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:11:42 +0100 (MET) 13958
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:11:38 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jBNMBcYf022476;
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:11:38 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:11:38 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: <readline/rltypedefs.h>, info documentation: semantics of return
value of rl_ function types not documented
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
in readline5, that's documented in the info docs:
A command function should return 0 if its action completes
successfully, and a non-zero value if some error occurs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
