Your message dated Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:27:11 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#255761: libnet0: broken on 64bit arches
has caused the Debian Bug report #255761,
regarding libnet0: broken on 64bit arches
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
255761: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=255761
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnet0
Version: 1.0.2a-5
Severity: important

This version of libnet uses u_long many places where it really means
u_int32_t.  Thus any apps using it will segfault or just not work on
64bit arches.

(I know this package is obsolete, so I don't really expect it to be
fixed, just putting this bug as a warning/record of the problem.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:30:43 +0200 Domenico Andreoli <[email protected]>
wrote:
> tags 255761 + wontfix
> thanks
> 
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 02:27:55PM -0700, Matthew Mueller wrote:
> > Package: libnet0
> > Version: 1.0.2a-5
> > Severity: important
> > 
> > This version of libnet uses u_long many places where it really means
> > u_int32_t.  Thus any apps using it will segfault or just not work on
> > 64bit arches.
> > 
> > (I know this package is obsolete, so I don't really expect it to be
> > fixed, just putting this bug as a warning/record of the problem.)
> > 
> 
> this has been fixed in the 1.1.x branch, i won't backport the fix
> to 1.0.x.

libnet0 is long gone ...


Andreas

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to