Your message dated Wed, 08 Jul 2015 09:42:14 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#789246: FTBFS amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #789246,
regarding FTBFS amd64
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
789246: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789246
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gnupg2
Version: 2.1.5-1
Tags: experimental
Severity: serious

Hi,

gnupg2 fails to build on amd64:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnupg2&arch=amd64&ver=2.1.5-1&stamp=1434056203

Regards,
Daniel

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:          [email protected]
Internet:       http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue 2015-06-30 18:37:05 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> looking at the test that it seems to hang on (agent/t-protect), i tried
> running it on my own machine and got the attached strace.  (it completes
> quickly)
>
> we checked with Q_, who looked at the buildd, and it's definitely
> hanging running agent/t-protect: the process is in R (running) state.
>
> agent/t-protect.c is pretty simple, and it's not hanging on other
> architectures.  I'm perplexed as to why it's not terminating on that
> platform.

We managed to get a copy of t-protect from the affected system
(x86-csail-01) and it runs fine without any delay or hang on other
systems.  So i suspect the problem is with x86-csail-01 itself.

2.1.6-1 built fine yesterday on babin, so i'm closing this ticket.

        --dkg

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to