Your message dated Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:52:04 +0200 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#701518: lm-sensors unable to detect/control fan of HP Compaq 6730s laptop has caused the Debian Bug report #701518, regarding lm-sensors unable to detect/control fan of HP Compaq 6730s laptop to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 701518: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701518 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: lm-sensors Version: 1:3.3.2-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Updating my (HP Compaq 6730s) laptop to wheezy I can't get fancontrol to run properly. I think lm-sensors is unable to find/configure the fan control system. After the install I get the following message on boot up: === [warn] Not starting fancontrol; run pwmconfig first. ... (warning). === Running pwmconfig I get the following error message: === /usr/sbin/pwmconfig: There are no pwm-capable sensor modules installed === Running the 'sensors' command I turn up the following: === acpitz-virtual-0 Adapter: Virtual device temp1: +53.0°C (crit = +110.0°C) temp2: +49.0°C (crit = +256.0°C) temp3: +49.0°C (crit = +112.0°C) temp4: +51.0°C (crit = +105.0°C) temp5: +30.6°C (crit = +112.0°C) temp6: +50.0°C (crit = +110.0°C) coretemp-isa-0000 Adapter: ISA adapter Core 0: +45.0°C (high = +105.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) Core 1: +49.0°C (high = +105.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) === Running sensors-detect I get the following: === # sensors-detect # sensors-detect revision 6031 (2012-03-07 17:14:01 +0100) # System: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq 6730s [F.07] (laptop) # Board: Hewlett-Packard 30E9 This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions, unless you know what you're doing. Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded sensors. Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no): ^C walter:/var/log# sensors-detect | tee /tmp/sensors-detect.log ^Cwalter:/var/log# clear walter:/var/log# sensors-detect # sensors-detect revision 6031 (2012-03-07 17:14:01 +0100) # System: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq 6730s [F.07] (laptop) # Board: Hewlett-Packard 30E9 This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions, unless you know what you're doing. Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded sensors. Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no): y Module cpuid loaded successfully. Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595... No VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors... No VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors... No AMD K8 thermal sensors... No AMD Family 10h thermal sensors... No AMD Family 11h thermal sensors... No AMD Family 12h and 14h thermal sensors... No AMD Family 15h thermal sensors... No AMD Family 15h power sensors... No Intel digital thermal sensor... Success! (driver `coretemp') Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor... No VIA C7 thermal sensor... No VIA Nano thermal sensor... No Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe. Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no): y Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'... No Trying family `SMSC'... Yes Found unknown chip with ID 0x4501 Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'... No Trying family `SMSC'... No Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No Trying family `ITE'... No Some hardware monitoring chips are accessible through the ISA I/O ports. We have to write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe though. Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have any ISA slots! Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (YES/no): y Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290... No Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290... No Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290... No Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290... No Lastly, we can probe the I2C/SMBus adapters for connected hardware monitoring devices. This is the most risky part, and while it works reasonably well on most systems, it has been reported to cause trouble on some systems. Do you want to probe the I2C/SMBus adapters now? (YES/no): y Sorry, no supported PCI bus adapters found. Module i2c-dev loaded successfully. Next adapter: Radeon i2c bit bus 0x90 (i2c-0) Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): y Next adapter: Radeon i2c bit bus 0x91 (i2c-1) Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): y Next adapter: Radeon i2c bit bus 0x92 (i2c-2) Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): y Next adapter: Radeon i2c bit bus 0x93 (i2c-3) Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): y Next adapter: Radeon i2c bit bus 0x14 (i2c-4) Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): y Client found at address 0x4f Probing for `National Semiconductor LM75'... No Probing for `National Semiconductor LM75A'... No Probing for `Dallas Semiconductor DS75'... No Probing for `Dallas Semiconductor DS1621/DS1631'... No Probing for `Maxim MAX6642'... No Probing for `Texas Instruments TMP421'... No Probing for `Texas Instruments TMP422'... No Probing for `Maxim MAX6633/MAX6634/MAX6635'... No Probing for `NXP/Philips SA56004'... No Client found at address 0x50 Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'... No Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'... No Probing for `SPD EEPROM'... No Probing for `EDID EEPROM'... Yes (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip) Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done. Just press ENTER to continue: Driver `coretemp': * Chip `Intel digital thermal sensor' (confidence: 9) To load everything that is needed, add this to /etc/modules: #----cut here---- # Chip drivers coretemp #----cut here---- If you have some drivers built into your kernel, the list above will contain too many modules. Skip the appropriate ones! Do you want to add these lines automatically to /etc/modules? (yes/NO)n Unloading i2c-dev... OK Unloading cpuid... OK === Finally, sniffing through the dmesg log I found two things that might be relevant. There is a kernel oops aboutt a bad BIOS: === [ 0.000000] WARNING: at /build/buildd-linux_3.2.35-2-amd64-v9djlH/linux-3.2.35/drivers/iommu/dmar.c:492 warn_invalid_dmar+0x77/0x85() [ 0.000000] Hardware name: HP Compaq 6730s [ 0.000000] Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address 0! [ 0.000000] BIOS vendor: Hewlett-Packard; Ver: 68PZD Ver. F.07; Product Version: F.07 [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: [ 0.000000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 Debian 3.2.35-2 [ 0.000000] Call Trace: [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff81046a75>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0x8c === There is also a i2c error message: === [ 6552.951207] i2c /dev entries driver [ 6572.123203] i2c i2c-4: sendbytes: NAK bailout. [ 6572.124176] i2c i2c-4: sendbytes: NAK bailout. [ 6572.125070] i2c i2c-4: sendbytes: NAK bailout. [ 6572.125956] i2c i2c-4: sendbytes: NAK bailout. === -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers testing-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages lm-sensors depends on: ii libc6 2.13-38 ii libsensors4 1:3.3.2-2 ii lsb-base 4.1+Debian8 ii perl 5.14.2-18 ii sed 4.2.1-10 lm-sensors recommends no packages. Versions of packages lm-sensors suggests: ii fancontrol 1:3.3.2-2 pn i2c-tools <none> pn read-edid <none> pn sensord <none> - no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On 2015-08-10 19:37, Tim Long wrote: > Hi, > > I had totally forgotten about this bug. > > It appears that the problem solved itself. The laptop has a standalone > temperature and fan controller not influenced by the OS. When I ran a > windows testing application it did a stress test which seemed to blow out > dust and got the fan moving. I have not had a problem since. > > You can close the bug. Thanks for the feedback, I am closing the bug with this mail. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
