Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:06:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2005 22:20:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 31 15:20:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DzMAa-0005gU-00; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 15:20:32 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA04675
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:29 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B754BFC3D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:28 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 16468-35 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:28 +0200 (MEST) 13914
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:28 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6VMKR8f018048;
Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:27 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:27 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: htmlgen
Version: 1.8.24-1
Severity: serious
please build in a current unstable build environment, tighten the
build dependency on the libfltk1.1 development package.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 320720-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 13:06:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 05:06:19 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evwj5-0006Ny-PZ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:06:19 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9A5107002; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:06:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:06:18 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gwtGiOGliFx8mAnm"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--gwtGiOGliFx8mAnm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Since htmldoc 1.8.24-2 is in testing just fine on all archs, with a
dependency on the new libfltk1.1c102 everywhere, the reason for a versioned
build-dependency is past; I think this bug can just be closed.
Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--gwtGiOGliFx8mAnm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDwl/KKN6ufymYLloRAnxRAKDSen6lzoBqjPb7UjVFzHorkmCrlwCgn3Jw
X3/Wg/vcUFgr+F1OPB5Eqqo=
=ssCy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gwtGiOGliFx8mAnm--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
