Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:22:21 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#706647: wrong release identification on the buildds
has caused the Debian Bug report #706647,
regarding wrong release identification on the buildds
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
706647: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706647
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: buildd.debian.org,base-files
Severity: important
In #706480, Adam Barret did point out a missing binary package in openjdk-7 on
powerpc, which I can track down to a rather oldish version of base-files used on
the parry buildd, which lists the release code name still as sid, not wheezy.
There are two issues I would like to see addressed:
- please keep the packages of a buildd chroot (debootstrap --variant=buildd)
current. If that's not possible, please set up a list of packages which
should always be current and update these on a regular basis (like
base-files).
- The base-files packages was updated only very late during the release
freeze. Please could you consider updating this package like all packages
at freeze time for upcoming releases?
During freezes, is there a way to have testing identified as as squeeze, and
unstable as sid? Currently there is no way to make a differentiation between
wheezy and sid.
Thanks, Matthias
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2013-05-03 11:35, Santiago Vila wrote:
> reassign 706647 buildd.debian.org
> thanks
>
> On Thu, 2 May 2013, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > Package: buildd.debian.org,base-files
> > Severity: important
> >
> > In #706480, Adam Barret did point out a missing binary package in openjdk-7
> > on
> > powerpc, which I can track down to a rather oldish version of base-files
> > used on
> > the parry buildd, which lists the release code name still as sid, not
> > wheezy.
> >
> > There are two issues I would like to see addressed:
> >
> > - please keep the packages of a buildd chroot (debootstrap
> > --variant=buildd)
> > current. If that's not possible, please set up a list of packages which
> > should always be current and update these on a regular basis (like
> > base-files).
>
> This is the buildd part, nothing to object.
All the official build daemons now recreate their chroots every Sunday,
so this should not happen anymore.
I am therefore closing the bug.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
[email protected] http://www.aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
