Your message dated Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:23:46 +0100
with message-id
<[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#808568: ca-certificates: show certificates subjects
has caused the Debian Bug report #808568,
regarding ca-certificates: show certificates subjects
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
808568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808568
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ca-certificates
Version: 20151214
Severity: wishlist
Hi.
Right now, the selection dialog when reconfiguring
the enabled certificates shows the pathnames of their
files, which in turn are apparently based on the OU
filed.
This seems in many cases pretty unclear, e.g.
"mozilla/ePKI_Root_Certification_Authority.crt"
It would help IMHO, if additionally the whole subject DN
would be printed, e.g.
"/C=TW/O=Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd./OU=ePKI Root Certification Authority"
Given that Mozilla includes for money basically any
CA nowadays, even such which are inherently untrustworthy
it seems especially helpful, if the C filed would
be shown, so that people who don't want to make themselves
unnecessarily victims of totalitarian countries, can
more easily sort out CAs from there.
Thanks,
Chris.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, December 21, 2015 03:08, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Given that Mozilla includes for money basically any
> CA nowadays, even such which are inherently untrustworthy
> it seems especially helpful, if the C filed would
> be shown, so that people who don't want to make themselves
> unnecessarily victims of totalitarian countries, can
> more easily sort out CAs from there.
Such polarizing comments are not welcome and do not serve to improve
Debian. I'm closing the bug now. Please refrain from posting new bugs as
long as you intend to include statements that accuse colleague developers
of corruption.
We will welcome any factual bug reports that do not seek to spread FUD or
polarize as this is very much off topic for the Debian BTS.
Cheers,
Thijs
--- End Message ---
