Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:32:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346633: fixed in bclock 1.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:32 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62]
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EvlzU-0000li-2t
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:32 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60)
id 1Evlyz-0006jK-98
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bclock: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: bclock
Version: 1.0-11
Severity: serious
Hello,
This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
source.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev
As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html
The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
affected packages can be found here [4].
[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev
Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
their upload.
Thanks for your collaboration!
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 346633-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2006 19:41:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 17 11:41:37 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EywYo-0002pg-IV; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:32:06 -0800
From: Teemu Hukkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346633: fixed in bclock 1.0-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:32:06 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: bclock
Source-Version: 1.0-12
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bclock, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
bclock_1.0-12.diff.gz
to pool/main/b/bclock/bclock_1.0-12.diff.gz
bclock_1.0-12.dsc
to pool/main/b/bclock/bclock_1.0-12.dsc
bclock_1.0-12_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/b/bclock/bclock_1.0-12_powerpc.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Teemu Hukkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated bclock package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:19:09 +0200
Source: bclock
Binary: bclock
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.0-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Teemu Hukkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Teemu Hukkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
bclock - Bezier Clock
Closes: 346633
Changes:
bclock (1.0-12) unstable; urgency=low
.
* xlibs-dev transition (Closes: #346633)
* Updated standards-version
- build with debugging symbols by default
* Fixed lintian warnings
- new menu file location
- unquoted strings in menu file
- quoted all - signs in manpage
- really strip all unnecessary sections from the binary
Files:
25511d8674cbf26afc635209aa45ca82 611 x11 optional bclock_1.0-12.dsc
2047922bfc3aa8418a5536837827b467 12643 x11 optional bclock_1.0-12.diff.gz
9f7f236eb9986f14d176b4632448432d 14110 x11 optional bclock_1.0-12_powerpc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDzUR1VMJPtTsLuakRAiI0AJ0ZZrUMzp+iaJGwKYlZX/Pev9/DBQCfXM44
FYk2NB3yM85mgBNAnpHPBk8=
=eSPu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
