Your message dated Mon, 25 Jan 2016 03:12:21 -0500
with message-id <3031830.60Xz2I9hg5@kitterma-e6430>
and subject line Re: Bug#812117: RM: simpletal -- RoQA; unmaintained; low popcon
has caused the Debian Bug report #812117,
regarding RM: simpletal -- RoQA; unmaintained; low popcon
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
812117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
The maintainer (jenner) seems MIA (even if not declered officially by
the mia team), nobody in the DPMT stepped up maintaining it in the last
10 years, and packaging a new upstream release that is out since at
least 2009.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thursday, January 21, 2016 09:01:12 AM Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > loggerhead: loggerhead
>
> And that rdep is relatively important since AFAIK we use loggerhead at least
> on alioth to browse bzr repositories.
>
> Maybe it's best to invest a bit of time into updating it rather than
> dropping it just for the sake of its low popcon?
I think that's a good enough reason to not remove it for now. It's not like
it's buggy or otherwise problematic at the moment.
Scott K
--- End Message ---
