Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:33:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348810: QA Developer summary page broken for duck account
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2006 02:17:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 18 18:17:37 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from orfeo.duckcorp.org
([195.5.254.194] helo=mx.duckcorp.org ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EzPMn-0007Lv-1Q
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:17:37 -0800
Received: from localhost (Orfeo.duckcorp.org [127.0.0.1])
by mx.duckcorp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CEA500509
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:17:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mx.duckcorp.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.duckcorp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 12152-02 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:17:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Orfeo (Orfeo [127.0.0.1])
by mx.duckcorp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03B650009A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:17:27 +0100 (CET)
From: Marc =?utf-8?Q?Dequ=C3=A8nes?= (Duck) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: QA Developer summary page broken for duck account
Organization: DuckCorp
X-URL: https://www.duckcorp.org/
X-GnuPG-Key: 0x90267086
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:17:21 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis at DuckCorp
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
Look at this:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?package=3Dslune&comaint=3Dyes
BTW, i'm to feed a bug against b.d.o for a similar problem. This is very
annoying to be unable to use our important tools, thus the severity.
=2D-=20
Marc Dequ=C3=A8nes (Duck)
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDzva3sczZcpAmcIYRAq/HAJ9hmGcNnSy93DMkNjDl+RzHLOca9QCggG9L
n28qCtCgfskKYc4fGYSVp7o=
=Dwdp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 348810-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2006 14:33:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 19 06:33:45 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from uni-sb.de ([134.96.252.33])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EzarB-0005AZ-AY
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:33:45 -0800
Received: from mail.cs.uni-sb.de (mail.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.254.200])
by uni-sb.de (8.13.5/2006010500) with ESMTP id k0JEXheb007476
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:33:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de (intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.241.4])
by mail.cs.uni-sb.de (8.13.5/2006010200) with ESMTP id k0JEXhVf002664
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:33:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: by intertalk.cs.uni-sb.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B9ABB4A8C2; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:33:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:33:42 +0100
From: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#348810: QA Developer summary page broken for duck account
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please
X-Face: ([EMAIL PROTECTED](D\O)J!Qu\q4fh8W^7WGqxpwTk&Xy0*ya<[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/TA:l\Pde>wYj,M;75"
N13_k}S.rS#lmX[G]QOuw[H"4#z$tSn$SkV<IurN'6;gkRFZw@/XLtl7":0v&kN3*-iM~q*;.*CfH@
qM>5ucV193Tz3IWj<]8at(6"K.ht//s"Ds,xMV9A\_bN/)[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-dF34Kw?,<G0ya
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by uni-sb.de id
k0JEXheb007476
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Re: Adeodato Sim=F3 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (For the record, #348859, and as noted there, case-sensivity related.
> Marc uses [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the maintainer field, not [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.org).
Fixed in CVS, thanks.
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
