Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:54:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not making senses
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2005 20:30:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 20 13:30:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6ZzH-00022k-00; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:30:44 -0700
Received: from port-195-158-179-83.dynamic.qsc.de ([195.158.179.83]
helo=trinity.mike2k.de)
by mx02.qsc.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1E6Zym-0005vx-00; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 22:30:12 +0200
Received: from lucifer (lucifer.mike2k.de [10.10.10.11])
by trinity.mike2k.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BCF90157;
Sat, 20 Aug 2005 22:30:12 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael Stilkerich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libpam-ldap: pam_sm_chauthtok should not ask for old password if not
neccessary
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 22:30:12 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libpam-ldap
Version: 178-1
Severity: normal
pam_sm_chauthtok() should not ask for the old password if it is not required,
e.g. when authentication to the LDAP Server is done via password less methods
like GSSAPI/Kerberos-V.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages libpam-ldap depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.57 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.5-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libldap2 2.1.30-11 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libpam0g 0.76-23 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
libpam-ldap recommends no packages.
-- debconf information excluded
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324196-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2006 02:53:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 19 18:53:38 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns.snowman.net ([66.92.160.21])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EzmPC-0001MH-JH
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:53:38 -0800
Received: by ns.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DBD5117B6D; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:54:02 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:54:02 -0500
From: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not making senses
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v38w9LpDh8sgonSw"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
X-Info: http://www.snowman.net
X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.24ns.3.0 (i686)
X-Uptime: 21:52:54 up 222 days, 19:03, 13 users, load average: 0.05, 0.07, 0.05
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--v38w9LpDh8sgonSw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Greetings,
When using password less mechanisms like GSSAPI/Kerberos-V, you
shouldn't be using libpam-ldap for password changes (after all, the
password isn't stored in LDAP, and it can't change it!).
Thanks,
Stephen
--v38w9LpDh8sgonSw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD0FDKrzgMPqB3kigRAgZmAKCI6leEfrrXej/PZOmFi7wwmxQFpwCggq/G
Ti5qd1tWVp59UPCTJmlNOy8=
=ICwU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--v38w9LpDh8sgonSw--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
