Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:22:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libpam-ldap passes uri to libldap
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2005 07:06:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 26 23:06:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from santiago.familiasanchez.net ([66.93.20.6])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Er8uz-0004Ot-Rt
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:06:46 -0800
Received: from [192.168.2.2] (mayaguez.familiasanchez.net [192.168.2.2])
by santiago.familiasanchez.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F406009A6
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:06:44 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:06:44 -0500
From: Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Using "uri ldaps://" does not work without "port"
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libpam-ldap
Version: 178-1sarge1
When configuring libpam-ldap to use an ldaps://hostname URI, it doesn't
actually use the designated port of 636. I had to actually place the
"port 636" directive in /etc/pam_ldap.conf, otherwise PAM couldn't
connect to the LDAP server, because the connectoins on port 389 were
refused. This doesn't make sense, as all the documentation associated
with OpenLDAP specifies that ldaps goes over port 636.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 344876-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2006 03:21:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 19 19:21:43 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns.snowman.net ([66.92.160.21])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EzmqN-0008NG-6r
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:21:43 -0800
Received: by ns.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 86C4817AD9; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:22:07 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:22:07 -0500
From: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libpam-ldap passes uri to libldap
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="13mdsrSSi+Kla36p"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
X-Info: http://www.snowman.net
X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.24ns.3.0 (i686)
X-Uptime: 22:20:12 up 222 days, 19:30, 13 users, load average: 0.14, 0.06, 0.05
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--13mdsrSSi+Kla36p
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Greetings,
libpam-ldap doesn't actually do anything with the uri, it just passes
it verbatim to libldap which should choose the correct port.
Thanks,
Stephen
--13mdsrSSi+Kla36p
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD0FdfrzgMPqB3kigRAucoAJ9ORBWhcdm9nA5UXAQxdjjeGyG4JwCdEEPq
SL8GLHrG2HwjHdSSKyBCNog=
=XwAF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--13mdsrSSi+Kla36p--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
