Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:37:18 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#482412: Problem with pspdftex
has caused the Debian Bug report #482412,
regarding Problem with pspdftex
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
482412: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482412
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xfig
Version: 1:3.2.5-rel-2

2008/5/22 Loïc Grenié <[email protected]>:
    Hi,

    I find pspdftex a very useful export option for Xfig. Unfortunately it
  does not work for me because it does not take into account
 the "special" flag for text. I've followed the code flow and I think the
 reason is that the languages used for the "ps" and "pdf" part
 are respectively "eps" and "pdf" while they should be "pstex"
 and "pdftex".

  I've found that this patch helps (me) a lot because it uses "pstex"
 and "pdftex" instead of "eps" and "pdf". In addition I've done some
 minor code cleanup. Looking at earlier bug fixes of xfig, I understand
  that adding a "-b 0" option to the fig2dev commands might be useful,
 but I don't know.

  I took the liberty to write to B. V. Smith directly about this bug
  including the attached patch.

   Thank you,

        Loïc Grenié
diff -u xfig-3.2.5-rel.orig/u_print.c xfig-3.2.5-rel/u_print.c
--- xfig-3.2.5-rel.orig/u_print.c	2006-02-24 21:18:11.000000000 +0100
+++ xfig-3.2.5-rel/u_print.c	2008-05-22 16:57:31.000000000 +0200
@@ -228,7 +228,9 @@
 	real_lang = "eps";
 
     /* if lang is pspdf, call first with just "eps" */
-    if (!strncmp(lang, "pspdf", 5))
+    if (!strncmp(lang, "pspdftex", 8))
+	real_lang = "pstex";
+    else if (!strncmp(lang, "pspdf", 5))
 	real_lang = "eps";
 
     /* if binary CGM, real language is cgm */
@@ -334,7 +336,7 @@
 	strcat(prcmd, tmpcmd);
     } else if (!strcmp(lang,"pspdftex")) {
 	/* first generate postscript then PDF.  */
-	sprintf(tmpcmd, "-n %s", outfile);
+	sprintf(tmpcmd, "-n %s", name);
 	strcat(prcmd, tmpcmd);
 
 	if (backgrnd[0]) {
@@ -349,15 +351,14 @@
 	strcat(prcmd,tmp_name);
 
 	/* make it suitable for pstex. */
-	strsub(prcmd,"pspdftex","pstex",tmpcmd,0);
+	strcpy(tmpcmd, prcmd);
 	strcat(tmpcmd,".eps");
 	(void) exec_prcmd(tmpcmd, "EXPORT of PostScript part");
 
 	/* make it suitable for pdftex. */
-	strsub(prcmd,"eps","pdf",tmpcmd,0);
-	strsub(tmpcmd,"pspdftex","pdftex",prcmd,0);
-	strcat(prcmd,".pdf");
-	(void) exec_prcmd(prcmd, "EXPORT of PDF part");
+	strsub(prcmd,"pstex","pdftex",tmpcmd,0);
+	strcat(tmpcmd,".pdf");
+	(void) exec_prcmd(tmpcmd, "EXPORT of PDF part");
 
 	/* and then the tex code. */
 #ifdef I18N
diff -u xfig-3.2.5-rel.orig/w_library.c xfig-3.2.5-rel/w_library.c
--- xfig-3.2.5-rel.orig/w_library.c	2006-04-03 18:27:30.000000000 +0200
+++ xfig-3.2.5-rel/w_library.c	2008-05-22 14:52:52.000000000 +0200
@@ -1029,6 +1029,7 @@
     Widget	     menu, entry;
 #ifndef XAW3D1_5E
     Widget	     submenu;
+#else
     char	     submenu_name[200];
 #endif /* XAW3D1_5E */
     char	     menu_name[200];

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xfig
Source-Version: 1:3.2.5.c-1

On Thu, 22 May 2008,  Loïc Grenié wrote:

> Package: xfig
> Version: 1:3.2.5-rel-2
> 
> 2008/5/22 Loïc Grenié <[email protected]>:
>     Hi,
> 
>     I find pspdftex a very useful export option for Xfig. Unfortunately it
>   does not work for me because it does not take into account
>  the "special" flag for text. I've followed the code flow and I think the
>  reason is that the languages used for the "ps" and "pdf" part
>  are respectively "eps" and "pdf" while they should be "pstex"
>  and "pdftex".
> 
>   I've found that this patch helps (me) a lot because it uses "pstex"
>  and "pdftex" instead of "eps" and "pdf". In addition I've done some
>  minor code cleanup. Looking at earlier bug fixes of xfig, I understand
>   that adding a "-b 0" option to the fig2dev commands might be useful,
>  but I don't know.
> 
>   I took the liberty to write to B. V. Smith directly about this bug
>   including the attached patch.

In the meantime this is implemented and in a second step fixed upstream:

Patchlevel 5c (August, 2013)
[...]
   o When exporting to combined PS/PDF/LATEX the -D option to exclude
     all but active layers was not passed to fig2dev
[...]

Patchlevel 5a (Mar 16, 2009):
[...]
   o When exporting to all three: PostScript, PDF and TeX, incorrectly
     generated PostScript and PDF that included LaTeX-only (special)
     text
[...]

Tschoeeee

        Roland

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to