Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:49:02 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347948: psad: The README.debian file is unclear.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2006 18:09:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 13 10:09:53 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net ([194.159.73.195])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1ExTN3-0005Bi-GT
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:09:53 -0800
Received: from nietsch.demon.nl ([82.161.170.206]:32983 helo=localhost)
        by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
        id 1ExTN2-000067-3q; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:09:52 +0000
Received: from jib by localhost with local (Exim 4.60)
        (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
        id 1ExTN1-0000dn-Bi; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:09:51 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jelle Boomstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: psad: The README.debian file is unclear.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:09:50 +0100
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on localhost); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: psad
Version: 1.4.4-1
Severity: minor

 what is the purpose of the first paragraph? If those are instructions,
 make that clear, Like: because of X, you have to do this: Y. Scrub the
 comments about being lazy. have some native english speaker proofread
 it. Please?  

 A description what the script below it does would be nice too. english
 language still parses mere quickly than shell.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (601, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-skas3-v8
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to 
default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages psad depends on:
ii  ipchains                      1.3.10-16  Network firewalling for Linux 2.2.
ii  iptables                      1.3.3-2    Linux kernel 2.4+ iptables adminis
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-8    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcarp-clan-perl             5.3-3      Perl enhancement to Carp error log
ii  libdate-calc-perl             5.4-4      Perl library for accessing dates
ii  libnetwork-ipv4addr-perl      0.10-1.1   The Net::IPv4Addr perl module API 
ii  libunix-syslog-perl           0.100-4    Perl interface to the UNIX syslog(
ii  perl                          5.8.7-9    Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  psmisc                        21.8-1     Utilities that use the proc filesy
ii  sysklogd [syslogd]            1.4.1-17   System Logging Daemon
ii  whois                         4.7.11     the GNU whois client

Versions of packages psad recommends:
ii  bastille                      1:2.1.1-12 Security hardening tool

-- debconf information excluded

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 347948-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2006 06:49:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 19 22:49:31 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gw.gutreu.ch ([62.12.146.189] helo=thinx.tp.ch)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Ezq5T-0005Ky-O0
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 22:49:31 -0800
Received: from thinx.tp.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by thinx.tp.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id E2A563F25D; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:48:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from tux.tp.ch (tux.tp.ch [192.168.0.100])
        by thinx.tp.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 821D13EA81; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:48:59 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Bug#347948: psad: The README.debian file is unclear.
From: Daniel Gubser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jelle Boomstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:49:02 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hello Jelle

On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 19:09 +0100, Jelle Boomstra wrote:
> Package: psad
> Version: 1.4.4-1
> Severity: minor
> 
>  what is the purpose of the first paragraph? If those are instructions,
>  make that clear, Like: because of X, you have to do this: Y. Scrub the
>  comments about being lazy. have some native english speaker proofread
>  it. Please? 

Sorry, but this is good english, it is clear, otherwise please read also
the man page

Daniel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to