Your message dated Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:58:13 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line not (no longer) a bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #433735,
regarding systraq: exclude packages from systraq debsums check (was: Re:
systraq config on Debian Etch [...])
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
433735: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433735
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: systraq
Version: 0.0.20050213-8
Severity: wishlist
Op Sun 15 Jul 2007 om 01:55:57 +0200 schreef Joost van Baal:
> Op Tue 10 Jul 2007 om 07:07:48 +0200 schreef Joost van Baal:
> > Op Sat 7 Jul 2007 om 07:47:55 +0100 schreef Chris Evans:
> > >
> > > There are some debs that rapidly get so their files don't match their
> > > debsums because they are updated by a route other than dpkg. (The
> > > libraries/packages that come with the R statistical system for me.) It
> > > would be great if it were possible to exclude these from the debsums
> > > check in systraq. I think the real feature request would be for debsums
> > > though, not for systraq though perhaps there would be a way you could
> > > grep the debsums output to ignore a set of debs we could specify?
>
> This could be done by changing /etc/systraq/systraq.d/nn-debsums.
>
> Perhaps the output of "dpkg -l" could be fed to debsums, after some
> modifications. Your idea is interesting, for sure.
Otoh, this might be a bug in the R packages. Perhaps such a package
should exclude changing files from their md5sum list. I am not quite
sure...
Bye,
Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Andreas Beckmann wrote, on Wed, 29 May 2013 14:11:44 +0200:
> The R packages finally got fixed :-)
Therefore, closing this bug.
Thanks, Bye,
Joost
--- End Message ---
