Your message dated Sat, 05 Mar 2016 00:22:36 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#811434: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #752524,
regarding net/http: tries to resolve literal [::1] address
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
752524: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752524
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libruby2.1
Version: 2.1.2-2
Severity: normal
Tags: ipv6

how-can-i-help was choking on my proxy specification:

| $ http_proxy='http://[::1]:8123/' how-can-i-help
| how-can-i-help: Error downloading data file: getaddrinfo: Name or service not 
known

tcpdump'ing the DNS traffic revealed that it was trying to resolve [::1]
as a hostname:

| $ sudo tcpdump -ni lo port 53
| tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
| listening on lo, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
| 14:39:30.670115 IP6 ::1.41315 > ::1.53: 35599+ A? [::1]. (23)
| 14:39:30.670128 IP6 ::1.41315 > ::1.53: 18434+ AAAA? [::1]. (23)
| 14:39:30.670200 IP6 ::1.53 > ::1.41315: 35599 NXDomain 0/1/0 (98)
| 14:39:30.670229 IP6 ::1.53 > ::1.41315: 18434 NXDomain 0/1/0 (98)
| ^C

I reduced how-can-i-help's code to get a hopefully minimal example
(attached): making a request to http://[::1]/ is enough, there doesn't
need to be a proxy involved. Curiously, other literal IPv6 addresses
seem to work; http://[::2]/ tries to connect, http://[::0]/ produces a
Net::HTTPGatewayTimeOut and http://[2001:41c8:1000:21::21:4]/ just
succeeds. Only ::1 ever (incorrectly) hits the DNS.

I tried to debug further, but since I couldn't find a suspicious-looking
::1 constant and don't understand ruby regexes, someone who actually
knows ruby will have to pick up here.

thanks,
    Jan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (550, 'unstable'), (10, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libruby2.1 depends on:
ii  libc6         2.19-1
ii  libffi6       3.1-2
ii  libgdbm3      1.8.3-12
ii  libgmp10      2:6.0.0+dfsg-4
ii  libjs-jquery  1.7.2+dfsg-3
ii  libncurses5   5.9+20140118-1
ii  libreadline6  6.3-6
ii  libssl1.0.0   1.0.1h-3
ii  libtinfo5     5.9+20140118-1
ii  libyaml-0-2   0.1.4-3.2
ii  ruby2.1       2.1.2-2
ii  zlib1g        1:1.2.8.dfsg-1

libruby2.1 recommends no packages.

libruby2.1 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Attachment: direct.rb
Description: application/ruby

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.1.5-4+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package ruby2.1 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/811434

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[email protected].

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to