Your message dated Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:04:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libogg-dev:${shlibs:Depends} not correctly expanded when
libogg is needed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 12:19:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 04:19:32 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp13.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.54])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0HiO-00005M-7p
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:19:32 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf1306.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 03C82700008E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:19:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette
(ADijon-256-1-86-184.w86-204.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.204.5.184])
by mwinf1306.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C04C3700008D;
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:19:00 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by tangerine.coulon.evette with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1F0Hhp-0003sI-Up; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:18:58 +0100
Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (tangerine.coulon.evette [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port
10024)
with ESMTP id 02273-02; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:18:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from jean-luc by tangerine.coulon.evette with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1F0Hho-0003sA-J5; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:18:56 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libogg-dev: ${shlibs:Depends} not correctly expanded when libogg is
needed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:18:56 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at coulon.evette
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libogg-dev
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: important
Hi,
With version 1.1.3-1 of libogg0 / libogg-dev, I cannot build a package which
depends on it.
${shlibs:Depends} doesnt expands correctly and I build time, I get:
dh_builddeb
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/kino/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package
`kino':
`Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected
dh_builddeb: command returned error code 512
If I've a look in debian/kino.substvars, I've:
Package: kino
Version: 1:0.8.1+cvs20060116-1
Section: graphics
Priority: extra
Architecture: amd64
Depends: (>= 1.1.2), libasound2 (>> 1.0.10), libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.9.0),
libavc1394-....
The package name is missing and I get only the version.
I've this error with other package which requires libogg also.
I've reverted from 1.1.3 to 1.1.2 and the package compiles fine.
Regards
Jean-Luc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-k8-3
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages libogg-dev depends on:
ii libc6-dev 2.3.5-12 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii libogg0 1.1.2-1 Ogg Bitstream Library
libogg-dev recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 349160-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2006 13:09:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 21 05:09:55 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp13.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.54])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F0IV9-0002LX-Cd
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:09:55 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf1307.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 685347000096
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:09:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette
(ADijon-256-1-86-184.w86-204.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.204.5.184])
by mwinf1307.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2435F700008C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:09:24 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by tangerine.coulon.evette with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1F0IPn-0003uj-Cr
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:04:23 +0100
Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (tangerine.coulon.evette [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port
10024)
with ESMTP id 10771-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:04:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=tangerine)
by tangerine.coulon.evette with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1F0IPm-0003uV-Aq
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:04:22 +0100
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:04:22 +0100
From: "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libogg-dev:${shlibs:Depends} not correctly expanded when libogg is
needed
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEV7e3v8/Pzy8vKqqqr/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X-Mailer: Balsa 2.3.8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Sun4VmE0oFqDus2zTd5x"
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at coulon.evette
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-Sun4VmE0oFqDus2zTd5x
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Solved with version 1.1.3-2
Regards
Jean-Luc
--=-Sun4VmE0oFqDus2zTd5x
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBD0jFWUdGGXzzGnNARAg1jAJ0d6iMcMkaHbG8io4cWQCsb0qkKmACeJGPB
92EUYKDn+SlIwJh1/ptPy0o=
=HSyi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-Sun4VmE0oFqDus2zTd5x--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
