Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:52:45 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#820590: [email protected] systemd unit is broken
has caused the Debian Bug report #820590,
regarding [email protected] systemd unit is broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
820590: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820590
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tinc
Version: 1.0.27-1
Hi,
I noticed tinc now ships systemd units, which is a nice improvement.
Unfortunately, they do not work for me, as there is no /usr/bin/tinc
and it does not understand start/stop/reload. Specifically, instead
of:
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/tinc -n %i start -D
ExecReload=/usr/sbin/tinc -n %i reload
ExecStop=/usr/sbin/tinc -n %i stop
they should read:
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/tincd -n %i -D
ExecReload=/usr/sbin/tincd -n %i -k HUP
ExecStop=/usr/sbin/tincd -n %i -k
Regards,
Vedran
--
Vedran Miletić
http://vedranmileti.ch/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.0.27-1
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 01:16:40PM +0200, Vedran Miletić wrote:
> I noticed tinc now ships systemd units, which is a nice improvement.
> Unfortunately, they do not work for me, as there is no /usr/bin/tinc
> and it does not understand start/stop/reload.
Indeed. Accidentily, I copied the systemd service files from 1.1pre11.
The correct service files are included in 1.0.27-2, which has already
been uploaded.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
