Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:25:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349543: vdradmin: depends on unknown package "sendemail"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2006 17:15:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 23 09:15:20 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from anton.hin.de ([80.237.234.15] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F15Hk-00027d-94
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:15:20 -0800
Received: from anton.hin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by anton.hin.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0NHFBsx011080
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:15:11 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by anton.hin.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id k0NHFBIA011078
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:15:11 +0100
Received: from joshua.hin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by joshua.hin.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0NHASvK005168
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:10:28 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by joshua.hin.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0NHAS9l005166;
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:10:28 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Authentication-Warning: joshua.hin.de: jochen set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using -f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jochen Pawletta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: vdradmin: depends on unknown package "sendemail"
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:10:28 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: vdradmin
Version: 0.97-am3.4.2-3
Severity: important
Hi
The Package "vdradmin" depends on "sendemail", but I think it should
depend on "sendmail"?
Jochen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.32-own-02
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages vdradmin depends on:
ii adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups
ii libcompress-zlib-perl 1.34-1 Perl module for creation and manip
ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.45-2 A collection of modules that parse
ii libhtml-template-expr-perl 0.04-2 HTML::Template extension adding ex
ii libhtml-template-perl 2.6-2 HTML::Template : A module for usin
ii libparse-recdescent-perl 1.94-4 Generates recursive-descent parser
ii libtemplate-perl 2.14-1 template processing system written
ii liburi-perl 1.35-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin
ii perl 5.8.4-8sarge3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
pn sendemail Not found.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 349543-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2006 17:25:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 23 09:25:37 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F15Rh-0002s1-Dr
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:25:37 -0800
Received: from [213.9.120.226] (helo=cas.loc)
by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu7) with ESMTP (Nemesis),
id 0ML2Dk-1F15Rc0jbC-00042R; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:25:32 +0100
X-AuthUser: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from [192.168.0.50] (192.168.0.50:3355)
by cas.loc with [XMail 1.17 (Win32/Ix86) ESMTP Server]
id <S243E1> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:34:33 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:25:38 +0100
From: Tobias Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jochen Pawletta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Package Development List for VDR and VDR-related packages." <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#349543: vdradmin: depends on unknown package "sendemail"
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
login:39eb5d8d8b569da74da743100ed9cab3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Jochen Pawletta wrote:
> The Package "vdradmin" depends on "sendemail", but I think it should
> depend on "sendmail"?
>
No, sendemail is correct. I've been fooled too - terrible package
naming! :-)
Sendemail is not available in Sarge. But you can get a backport from here:
deb http://e-tobi.net/vdr-experimental sarge backports
( see also http://www.e-tobi.net/blog/pages/vdr-repository/ )
Tobias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
