Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:16:34 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing obsolete bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2004 17:55:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 26 10:55:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mxsf20.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.220] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1C0OTU-0005QU-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:55:48 -0700
Received: from mxip12.cluster1.charter.net (mxip12a.cluster1.charter.net 
[209.225.28.142])
        by mxsf20.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id 
i7QHtGK5021438
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:55:16 -0400
Received: from 66.227.173.147.gha.mi.chartermi.net (HELO 
lemmankinan.zigg.local) (66.227.173.147)
  by mxip12.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2004 13:55:16 -0400
X-Ironport-AV: i="3.84,114,1091419200"; 
   d="scan'208?asc'208"; a="246359905:sNHT16648048"
Received: from matt by lemmankinan.zigg.local with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1C0OSz-0006GM-VX
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:55:18 -0400
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:55:17 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: please include md and lvm support
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
From: Matt Behrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: kernel-image-sparc-2.4
Severity: wishlist

The image 2.4.26-sparc32 does not include the drivers for either md or
lvm, making it impossible to construct or mount any sort of array.


--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBLiQF+xq4JbgNGlMRApABAJoCmd+Rk6oddW5tOPVfvQIk+yOXmQCeLE4K
pbZ3NL8pR50haHVJBcFO91g=
=IwNR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 268234-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2006 18:16:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 23 10:16:38 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de ([213.133.98.126])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F16F4-0003XG-Em; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:16:38 -0800
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F16F0-0006jM-HJ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:16:34 +0100
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:16:34 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing obsolete bugs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Closing bugs against the obsolete kernel-image-sparc-2.4 package which
was actually removed in August 2005. None of these bugs seems to apply
to newer sparc kernel images.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to