Your message dated Sat, 23 Apr 2016 11:37:42 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Please backport to wheezy
has caused the Debian Bug report #750427,
regarding Please backport to wheezy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
750427: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750427
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: harfbuzz
Version: 0.9.28-2
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
thank you for packaging harfbuzz.
I tried to backport Qt5 to Wheezy and got stuck on harfbuzz as one of
its build dependencies. Unfortunately I don't know enough of its
toolchain to try and relax its gir/gobject dependencies.
Having harfbuzz backported to wheezy would seem to unlock both the Qt5
and the TeX backport efforts (as I've seen in #734389), and IMO would
breathe quite a lot of new life into our current stable release.
I wish it could be backported.
Ciao,
Enrico
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:55:18 +0100 Enrico Zini <[email protected]> wrote:
> Source: harfbuzz
> Version: 0.9.28-2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello,
>
> thank you for packaging harfbuzz.
>
> I tried to backport Qt5 to Wheezy and got stuck on harfbuzz as one of
> its build dependencies. Unfortunately I don't know enough of its
> toolchain to try and relax its gir/gobject dependencies.
>
> Having harfbuzz backported to wheezy would seem to unlock both the Qt5
> and the TeX backport efforts (as I've seen in #734389), and IMO would
> breathe quite a lot of new life into our current stable release.
Sorry for the late reply.
This is obviously not going to happen anymore.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
