Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:46:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349888: octave-gpc: missing libgpcl-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2006 19:48:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 25 11:48:09 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 85-18-136-103.fastres.net ([85.18.136.103] helo=sixtyfour)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F1qcj-0001fZ-MO
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:48:09 -0800
Received: by sixtyfour (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CAF428E62C; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:47:38 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roberto Pariset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: octave-gpc: missing libgpcl-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:47:38 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: octave-gpc
Version: 0.1.5-5
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
on amd64 it FTBFS as you can see on [1]. The reason is:
E: Couldn't find package libgpcl-dev
The bug is probably related to #334230 but I can't be sure as libgpcl-dev
is not apt-gettable now.
Thanks,
Roberto
[1]
http://amd64.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=amd64&pkg=octave-gpc&ver=0.1.5-5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 349888-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2006 21:46:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 25 13:46:32 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kom.mpisoc.mpg.de ([192.129.1.23] helo=kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F1sTH-0000YM-PW
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:46:31 -0800
Received: from amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de ([10.1.1.2])
by kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1F1sTG-0002E0-Tv; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:46:30 +0100
Received: from [10.80.1.253] (helo=laboiss2)
by amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
id 1F1sTH-0003Rt-00; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:46:31 +0100
Received: from rafael by laboiss2 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1F1sTF-0002BK-00; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:46:29 +0100
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:46:29 +0100
From: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Roberto Pariset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#349888: octave-gpc: missing libgpcl-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
* Roberto Pariset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-25 22:15]:
> I can't even compile libgpcl-dev, so I can't say if amd64 is affected
> by #334230 as well.
Why can't you compile the gpcl package on amd64? Could you please send
the build log to us?
> This said, I think the "bug" can be closed. And again, sorry for my
> mistake.
This message is doing it. Thanks for your report, anyway.
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
