Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:42:29 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349020: fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2006 14:59:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 20 06:59:13 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postduif.warande.net ([145.97.193.212])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EzxjN-0005Ih-Hf
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:59:13 -0800
Received: from 163pc223.sshunet.nl (163pc223.sshunet.nl [145.97.223.163])
by postduif.warande.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA5217B439;
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:59:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from xar.sliepen.oi ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by xar.sliepen.oi (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0KEx9Np013589
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:59:09 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by xar.sliepen.oi (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0KEx9XY013588;
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:59:09 +0100
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:59:09 +0100
From: Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Please remove the source package gmime and the binary packages
libgmime0 and libgmime0-dev from unstable.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5eYgouiXv72wBrai"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-oi: oi
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--5eYgouiXv72wBrai
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 06:40:32PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> s=F8n, 30.05.2004 kl. 13.37 skrev Guus Sliepen:
> > I am planning to upload libgmime2 with just the Maintainer: field
> > changed, and a new libgmime2.1 package. However, there are also packages
> > in unstable for libgmime0 and libgmime1. As far as apt-cache rdepends
> > can tell me, there are no Debian packages depending on them, so I'm
> > inclined to send an email to ftp-master to have them removed. However,
> > if you know that there still are people using those Debian packages,
> > I'll continue maintaining them.
>=20
> I have no idea. Like you, anyone using this library is apparently doing
> it for their own projects, not for Debian. But if you want my opinion,
> you can almost certainly remove libgmime0. However, I wouldn't want to
> remove libgmime1 yet - at least not before sarge is released (with it),
> in any case, and maybe not even before people start thinking about
> removing libglib1.2 itself from Debian. It's difficult to be sure
> without user feedback, for sure. Maybe not even http//popcon.debian.org/
> (seems to down at the moment) would help much here...
ftp-master: please remove libgmime0 and libgmime0-dev from unstable.
Ove: there is an FTBFS bug filed against gmime1 (#306610). If you don't
want to maintain this package anymore, please ask the ftp-masters to
remove gmime1 as well.
--=20
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--5eYgouiXv72wBrai
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD0Pq9AxLow12M2nsRAuFxAKCNIe8W6CXG3ICD6aMwcVXY3S9voACfeBLK
LrUWklNjBVzVyhX6MjTaKJc=
=yPVt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--5eYgouiXv72wBrai--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 349020-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2006 01:50:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 25 17:50:21 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jeroen by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1F1w9d-0007l4-20; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:42:29 -0800
From: Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: melanie $Revision: 1.44 $
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#349020: fixed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:42:29 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
gmime | 0.6.0-3 | source
libgmime0 | 0.6.0-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips,
mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libgmime0-dev | 0.6.0-3 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k,
mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.
Packages are never removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.
Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System. Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jeroen van Wolffelaar (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
