Your message dated Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:14:44 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bug - no response
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 10:43:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 02:43:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [194.78.218.75] (helo=itadsrv)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EpkO9-0002kC-G6
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 02:43:05 -0800
Received: from jwarnier by itadsrv with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EpkO8-0007CR-3y
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:43:04 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cedar-backup2: Please adapt the sample configuration to Debian
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:43:04 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on itadsrv); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: cedar-backup2
Version: 2.7.2-1
Severity: wishlist

Could you please already adapt the sample configuration file to Debian.
I think particularly to pathes to utilities like cdrecord, mkisofs, ...

Thanks


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages cedar-backup2 depends on:
ii  python2.3                  2.3.5-3sarge1 An interactive high-level object-o

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 344508-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2006 03:15:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 25 19:15:18 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net ([63.240.77.82])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F1xbR-0006Bx-W8
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:15:18 -0800
Received: from cedar-solutions.com ([67.190.241.233])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP
          id <2006012603144101200n6kl8e>; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 03:14:41 +0000
Received: from pronovic by cedar-solutions.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
        id 1F1xau-000463-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:14:44 -0600
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:14:44 -0600
From: Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing bug - no response
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Since I didn't get any response, and since I didn't want to implement
this in the first place, I'm closing this bug.

KEN

--=20
Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD2D6k8On2ujzZUQQRAvHPAKCdajMatdWlQCUMFGbL7no/6SEXQQCfb9WK
d7qPBmtMhcU+a+5Mk9Xz9V0=
=Ktr5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to