Your message dated Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:10:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Fwd: Re: Debugging evolution]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 13:20:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 23 06:20:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.15]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7YhS-0005Fo-00; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 06:20:22 -0700
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17])
by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C12E3067CF;
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:19:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369272C80E3;
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:19:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 26376-03; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:19:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id CD70A2C80E1;
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:19:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 23 Aug 2005
15:19:39 +0200
From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgtk2.0-0-dbg: strange directory and missing symlinks
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.16
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:19:39 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libgtk2.0-0-dbg
Version: 2.8.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hi,
I'm trying to use libgtk2.0-0-dbg to debug galeon. Unfortunately I have some
problems:
- libgtk2.0-0-dbg installs files in /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/ whereas many other
lib*-dbg libraries install files in /usr/lib/. I can work around this by
setting:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug:/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib
but I wonder if there is a particular reason for this ?
- libgtk2.0-0-dbg installs /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.800.0
but no libgtk-x11-2.0.so symlink. Therefore my LD_LIBRARY_PATH trick does
not work (ld.so still uses the non debug GTK library). Compare with what
the libpango1.0-dbg package does:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2005-08-19 06:14 /usr/lib/debug/libpango-1.0.so
-> libpango-1.0.so.0.1000.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 2005-08-19 06:14
/usr/lib/debug/libpango-1.0.so.0 -> libpango-1.0.so.0.1000.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 581795 2005-08-17 18:03
/usr/lib/debug/libpango-1.0.so.0.1000.0
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental'), (98, 'breezy')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages libgtk2.0-0-dbg depends on:
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.0-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
libgtk2.0-0-dbg recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324681-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2006 17:10:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 09:10:43 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ubuntu.cz ([81.95.102.29] helo=mail.ubuntu.cz)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F2Adv-0000jV-8C
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:10:43 -0800
Received: from [172.20.20.162] (fw.nic.cz [217.31.192.140])
by mail.ubuntu.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104DCA038378
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:10:41 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Debugging evolution]
From: Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MaEBV0Be/GO+1UgZ8qLl"
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:10:39 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-MaEBV0Be/GO+1UgZ8qLl
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-Ig2LGk6HagjO2pY4g0oQ"
--=-Ig2LGk6HagjO2pY4g0oQ
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> libgtk2.0-0-dbg doesn't ship real libraries but only the debugging
> symbols that correspond to the libraries in libgtk2.0-0. gdb (and
other
> debugging tools) should automatically pick up the debugging symbols
from
> the files in /usr/lib/debug.
--=20
Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--=-Ig2LGk6HagjO2pY4g0oQ
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Description: Forwarded message - Re: Debugging evolution
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.ubuntu.cz ([unix socket]) by ubuntu (Cyrus
v2.2.12-Debian-2.2.12-0.5ubuntu0) with LMTPA; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:47:20
+0100
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ubuntu.cz
(Postfix) with SMTP id 5629AA038338 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26
Jan 2006
17:47:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.org [146.82.138.6]) by
mail.ubuntu.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D32A038378 for <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:47:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by murphy.debian.org
(Postfix) with QMQP id 8CF4C2E9A2; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:47:13 -0600 (CST)
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Received: from smtp.nada.kth.se (essemtepe.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.115])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D8E2DF37 for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:03:27 -0600
(CST)
X-Authentication-Info: The sender was authenticated as mini using PLAIN at
smtp.nada.kth.se
Received: from yossarian.lan (84-217-18-200.tn.glocalnet.net
[84.217.18.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.nada.kth.se
(8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0QG3OdO029756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3
cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:03:24 +0100
(MET)
Subject: Re: Debugging evolution
From: Mikael Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:03:18 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1
X-Rc-Spam: 2005-09-11_01
X-Rc-Virus: 2005-11-10_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2005-09-11_01
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on murphy.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO
autolearn=no version=3.0.3
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [email protected]
X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/13481
X-Loop: [email protected]
List-Id: <debian-gtk-gnome.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:47:13 -0600 (CST)
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Thu Jan 26 17:47:20 2006
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899
X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 9809 chance of being spam
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-DSPAM-Signature: 43d8fd18150391281911701
X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, could, 0.01000, but, 0.01000,
List-Unsubscribe*mailto+debian-gtk-gnome-request, 0.01000,
Received*Postfix+with, 0.01000, Received*Postfix+with, 0.01000,
Received*localhost, 0.01000, Received*localhost, 0.01000, in+usr,
0.01000,
Received*by+murphy.debian.org, 0.01000, Received*by+murphy.debian.org,
0.01000, Received*debian-gtk-gnome+lists.debian.org, 0.01000,
X-Mailing-List*debian-gtk-gnome, 0.01000, org, 0.01000, org, 0.01000,
from,
0.01000, Content-Type*text+plain, 0.01000, of, 0.01000, Received*ESMTP,
0.01000, Received*ESMTP, 0.01000, List-Post*debian-gtk-gnome, 0.01000,
Received*bits, 0.01000, Received*bits, 0.01000,
X-Spam-Status*AWL+FORGED_RCVD_HELO, 0.01000, gtk, 0.01000,
Resent-Date*Thu,
0.01000, Content-Transfer-Encoding*8bit, 0.01000,
List-Unsubscribe*unsubscribe, 0.01000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
tor 2006-01-26 klockan 12:00 +0100 skrev Michel D=E4nzer:
>=20
> libgtk2.0-0-dbg doesn't ship real libraries but only the debugging
> symbols that correspond to the libraries in libgtk2.0-0. gdb (and other
> debugging tools) should automatically pick up the debugging symbols from
> the files in /usr/lib/debug.
Ok, thanks a lot.... that explains everything.
>=20
> In other words, the bug above is invalid.
Yes. Maybe someone could add the above comment and close it?=20
/Mikael
--=20
Plus =E7a change, plus c'est la m=EAme chose
--=20
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rg
--=-Ig2LGk6HagjO2pY4g0oQ--
--=-MaEBV0Be/GO+1UgZ8qLl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBD2QKP9OZqfMIN8nMRAh7EAJsFQX/IAtP894fsEB9KqsJoEnyAwACfc0My
fPm1Gitau7VCn9P8oUJtZPo=
=zvr+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-MaEBV0Be/GO+1UgZ8qLl--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
