Your message dated Sat, 28 Jan 2006 07:12:56 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line .extrafiles too new
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2006 20:52:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 25 12:52:56 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from frodo.hserus.net ([204.74.68.40])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F1rdQ-0001J1-G9
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:52:56 -0800
Received: from tc218-187-24-65.dialup.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.24.65]:2973
helo=jidanni1)
by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 #0)
id 1F1rdH-000DBC-93 by authid <jidanni> with plain
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 02:22:55 +0530
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please
Subject: cruft: no /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.extrafiles these days
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:31:28 +0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_SORBS,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: cruft
Version: 0.9.6-0.4
Severity: wishlist
I notice there are seems to be no /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.extrafiles
these days. Maybe cruft should be revised to take this into account.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 349909-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2006 04:28:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 27 20:28:56 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from frodo.hserus.net ([204.74.68.40])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F2hho-00083r-Qa
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:28:56 -0800
Received: from tc218-187-23-156.dialup.dynamic.apol.com.tw
([218.187.23.156]:2990 helo=jidanni1)
by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60 #0)
id 1F2hhn-000LqU-3L by authid <jidanni> with plain
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:58:55 +0530
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: .extrafiles too new
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 07:12:56 +0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Oops, I assumed that .extrafiles were something of the past, not the
future. Sorry. Closing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
