Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:34:41 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing a no more meaningful bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 20 01:12:37 2004 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2004 08:12:37 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from user1.channel1.com (channel1.com) [199.1.13.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BbxRN-0000xN-00; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 01:12:37 -0700 Received: from c-24-18-253-49.client.comcast.net ([24.18.253.49] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by channel1.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9) id 1BbxRL-0000lr-Vi; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 04:12:36 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Daniel Keshet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: =?iso-8859-15?q?linux-wlan-ng=3A_configure_fails_to_prompt_me_for_pcmcia-?= =?iso-8859-15?q?cs_source_dir=0D=0AConfigure_didn=27t_prompt_me_for_the_pcmc?= =?iso-8859-15?q?ia-cs_source_dir=2E=0D=0ANot_suprisingly=2C_the_resulting_mo?= =?iso-8859-15?q?dule_had_unresolved_symbols=2E?= Bcc: Daniel Keshet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 01:09:55 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: linux-wlan-ng Version: 0.2.0-15 Severity: important Tags: sid I hunted down the config option and added it manually to config.out and everything worked. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages linux-wlan-ng depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii sysvinit 2.85-15 System-V like init ii wireless-tools 26-6 Tools for manipulating Linux Wirel -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 04 02:35:13 2006 Received: (at 255314-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2006 10:35:13 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vsmtp1.tin.it ([212.216.176.141]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F5Kl7-0005ul-3y for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 02:35:13 -0800 Received: from attila.casa-tassi (87.3.40.25) by vsmtp1.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 43D82E4100817E04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:35:06 +0100 Received: from garfield.casa-tassi ([192.168.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain) by attila.casa-tassi with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1F5Kkc-0007Eq-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:34:42 +0100 Received: from tassi by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1F5Kkb-00017R-GE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:34:41 +0100 Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:34:41 +0100 From: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing a no more meaningful bug Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 0.2.0-15 is really really old, the 0.2.4+svnBLABLA uptually in sid should work. -- Enrico Tassi
--- End Message ---
