Your message dated Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:09:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #316920
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 04 12:48:34 2005
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jul 2005 19:48:34 +0000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp08.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.149] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DpWvi-0004JX-00; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 12:48:34 -0700
Received: from pc1.myname.nl (c529de713.cable.wanadoo.nl [82.157.231.19])
        by smtp8.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id D2BDD539A5; Mon,  4 Jul 2005 21:48:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compukid by pc1.myname.nl with local (Exim 4.51)
        id 1DpWw7-000733-IQ; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:48:59 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: firefox: segfault
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:48:59 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: firefox
Version: 1.0.4-2
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


I'm using a i386 sarge chroot on my amd64 box. Firefox segfaults on a
website. All other sites are working fine.

the website: http://www.naturetech.com.tw/_products/_888P.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCyZKrSTv4ppQVDnwRAv1DAKCQHE1xYJuXLjixiembwShh9TRVpgCdF9AB
UnwzbWbHkjsurxgtQLBBcyE=
=MRE5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 06 12:40:45 2006
Received: (at 316920-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2006 20:40:45 +0000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailout2.igs.net ([216.58.97.88])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F6DAD-00064s-91
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 12:40:45 -0800
Received: from nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca (nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca 
[66.11.161.69])
        by mailout2.igs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 290A147E898; Mon,  6 Feb 2006 15:40:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: by nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 9B098198E2A; Mon,  6 Feb 2006 15:09:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:09:21 -0500
From: Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: #316920
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Daniel van Eeden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've tested it again. I can't reproduce it. Maybe they changed the
> website....
> It's OK to close this call.

Thanks, closing.=20

> On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 17:53 -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > reassign 316920 firefox
> > tags 316920 unreproducible
> > thanks
> >=20
> > Any better in firefox 1.5?=20
> >=20

--=20
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C  2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+=20
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+=20
G e h! r- y+=20
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD56zxYemOzxbZcMYRApn0AJ0U8gh0vU1slK9O7qjn/s15WmuRUACgqXgh
H7zORk0eeyTO9Q0A9MJliX0=
=QaV6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to