Your message dated Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:42:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 23 06:55:53 2006
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2006 14:55:53 +0000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [84.77.112.161] (helo=amayita.com)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F136f-0000Yl-Mu
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:55:46 -0800
Received: by amayita.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 140E58911E0; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:55:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:55:43 +0100
From: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Not installable in unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18
Organization: Debian - http://www.debian.org/
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7
X-No-CC: Do not Cc me to mailing list posts unless you really have to
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: splashy
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental

[EMAIL PROTECTED]>apt-get install splashy
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  splashy: Depends: libdirectfb-0.9-20 but it is not installable
E: Broken packages

[EMAIL PROTECTED]>dpkg -l libdirectfb-0.9-\*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name                              Version                           
Description
+++-=================================-=================================-==================================================================================
ii  libdirectfb-0.9-22                0.9.22-8                          frame 
buffer graphics library


Please rebuild and depend on the available libdirectfb. Thanks

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

-- 
 .''`.                  sleep: command not found 
: :' :  
`. `'           Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
  `-     www.amayita.com  www.malapecora.com  www.chicasduras.com


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 06 13:42:26 2006
Received: (at 349520-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2006 21:42:27 +0000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.194])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F6E7u-0002iX-SQ
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:42:26 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i27so1452464wra
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:42:26 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        
b=VRnG7SlBTTfviSicoDi08LJ1Ltbi0avT5aAWyvvkV4lcb7o8kITvmqj4v0n7GdD/wFtcdi8sAGW7pTjeOVFPAjiBkDYIddF8lu+ADfzMOIUmZUDx92c8FIGXHfbSG/2w9Hi5LZ+b9sUJ4w7RvFuBVnKMbDT9Pk15v+q83UuyHQM=
Received: by 10.65.211.19 with SMTP id n19mr194704qbq;
        Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:42:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.116.14 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:42:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:42:26 -0500
From: Luis M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bug closed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

UGFja2FnZTogc3BsYXNoeQpTZXZlcml0eTogbm9ybWFsClRhZ3M6IGV4cGVyaW1lbnRhbApWZXJz
aW9uOiAwLjEuNi5zdm41CgotLQotLS0tKSgtLS0tLQpMdWlzIE1vbmRlc2kKU3lzdGVtIEFkbWlu
aXN0cmF0b3IKS2lza2V5aXgub3JnCgoiV2UgdGhpbmsgYmFzaWNhbGx5IHlvdSB3YXRjaCB0ZWxl
dmlzaW9uIHRvIHR1cm4geW91ciBicmFpbiBvZmYsIGFuZAp5b3Ugd29yayBvbiB5b3VyIGNvbXB1
dGVyIHdoZW4geW91IHdhbnQgdG8gdHVybiB5b3VyIGJyYWluIG9uIiAtLQpTdGV2ZSBKb2JzIGlu
IGFuIGludGVydmlldyBmb3IgTWFjV29ybGQgTWFnYXppbmUgMjAwNC1GZWIKCk5vIC5kb2M6IGh0
dHA6Ly93d3cuZ251Lm9yZy9waGlsb3NvcGh5L25vLXdvcmQtYXR0YWNobWVudHMuZXMuaHRtbAo=

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to