Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2016 18:13:29 +0200 with message-id <83614d27-e62d-1757-b997-dbd5bb7c3...@debian.org> and subject line Re: libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev: should conflict against libclutter-gtk-0.10-dev as provide the same include but different API has caused the Debian Bug report #648560, regarding libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev: should conflict against libclutter-gtk-0.10-dev as provide the same include but different API to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 648560: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648560 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev Version: 1.0.4-1 Severity: normal libclutter-gtk-0.10-dev provides /usr/include/clutter-1.0/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.h as libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev pkgconfig incirectly drag /usr/include/clutter-1.0 then when a program has <clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.h> the 0.10 one comes before the 1.0 /usr/include/clutter-gtk-1.0/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.h> whatever one can attempt. Could 1.0 dev package conflict again the 0.10 one to avoid one compiling evolution 3.4 wondering why everything looks good but still gcc complains of : e-mail-notebook-view.c: In function ‘create_gtk_actor’: e-mail-notebook-view.c:453:3: erreur: implicit declaration of function ‘gtk_clutter_actor_new’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] e-mail-notebook-view.c:453:3: attention : nested extern declaration of ‘gtk_clutter_actor_new’ [-Wnested-externs] e-mail-notebook-view.c:453:13: attention : assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] e-mail-notebook-view.c:454:3: erreur: implicit declaration of function ‘gtk_clutter_actor_get_widget’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] e-mail-notebook-view.c:454:3: attention : nested extern declaration of ‘gtk_clutter_actor_get_widget’ [-Wnested-externs] e-mail-notebook-view.c:454:3: erreur: implicit declaration of function ‘GTK_CLUTTER_ACTOR’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] e-mail-notebook-view.c:454:3: attention : nested extern declaration of ‘GTK_CLUTTER_ACTOR’ [-Wnested-externs] e-mail-notebook-view.c:454:7: attention : assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] cc1: some warnings being treated as errors Best regards Alban -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0test0 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev depends on: ii gir1.2-gtkclutter-1.0 1.0.4-1 ii libclutter-1.0-dev 1.8.2-1 ii libclutter-gtk-1.0-0 1.0.4-1 ii libgtk-3-dev 3.2.1-1 ii pkg-config 0.26-1 libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev recommends no packages. Versions of packages libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev suggests: ii libclutter-gtk-1.0-doc 1.0.4-1 -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:03:58 +0100 Alban Browaeys <pra...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Package: libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev > Version: 1.0.4-1 > Severity: normal > > libclutter-gtk-0.10-dev provides > /usr/include/clutter-1.0/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.h > as libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev pkgconfig incirectly drag > /usr/include/clutter-1.0 then when a program has > <clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.h> the 0.10 one comes before > the 1.0 /usr/include/clutter-gtk-1.0/clutter-gtk/clutter-gtk.h> > whatever one can attempt. > > Could 1.0 dev package conflict again the 0.10 one to avoid one compiling > evolution 3.4 wondering why everything looks good but still gcc > complains of : This concerns versions before oldstable, so I guess this ship has sailed long ago. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---