Your message dated Tue, 07 Feb 2006 05:17:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350729: fixed in cacao 0.94-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 31 04:54:13 2006 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2006 12:54:13 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dixsept.loria.fr ([152.81.9.195]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F3v1R-0001Qk-C3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 04:54:13 -0800 Received: from vlefevre by dixsept.loria.fr with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1F3v1P-0008Nw-OO; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:54:11 +0100 Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:54:11 +0100 From: Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: cacao: Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86 (regression) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 X-Mailer-Info: http://www.vinc17.org/mutt/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11-vl-20060130 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cacao Version: 0.94-1 Severity: normal With the following program: public class test { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { test t = new test(); t.doTest(); } volatile double x, y, z, d; public void doTest() { x = 9007199254740994.0; /* 2^53 + 2 */ y = 1.0 - 1/65536.0; z = x + y; d = z - x; System.out.println("z = " + z); System.out.println("d = " + d); } } I get on an x86 machine: z = 9.007199254740996E15 d = 2.0 According to the Java specifications, computations must correspond to the IEEE-754 double precision, and the result is incorrect. Package cacao 0.93-4 did not have this problem: z = 9.007199254740994E15 d = 0.0 For more information about this problem under Linux/x86 and various JVMs: http://www.vinc17.org/research/extended.html -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.4-20051215 Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages cacao depends on: ii binutils 2.16.1cvs20060117-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii classpath 2:0.20-2 clean room standard Java libraries ii classpath-common 2:0.20-2 architecture independent files ii libc6 2.3.5-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libltdl3 1.5.22-2 A system independent dlopen wrappe ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime cacao recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 07 05:22:08 2006 Received: (at 350729-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2006 13:22:08 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F6SiS-0001zl-H9; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 05:17:08 -0800 From: Stephan Michels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#350729: fixed in cacao 0.94-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 05:17:08 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: cacao Source-Version: 0.94-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cacao, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cacao_0.94-2.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.94-2.diff.gz cacao_0.94-2.dsc to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.94-2.dsc cacao_0.94-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.94-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Stephan Michels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cacao package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 23:43:13 +0100 Source: cacao Binary: cacao Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.94-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers <[email protected]> Changed-By: Stephan Michels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: cacao - Java virtual machine Closes: 350729 Changes: cacao (0.94-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/patches/01cacao-fpu-prec.patch: Add patch to fix incorrect results of computations in extended precision on x86. Closes: #350729 * debian/rules: Using the CDBS scripts. Files: 3b5ee63ca7d804b538287d8544e48325 804 interpreters optional cacao_0.94-2.dsc ea3863e83d6983f4cba68ecf598681f0 11185 interpreters optional cacao_0.94-2.diff.gz b59acae8dd5e0c9a49757ac3d304b018 515840 interpreters optional cacao_0.94-2_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD6Km5WSOgCCdjSDsRAp5+AJ93VXbD3kHUcVFU+16PJmIoZmDiPQCeJoWr AwhSKbejbPe7s5WK94BuTBQ= =2qDG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
