Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2016 19:05:49 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#615368: fixed in gcolor2 0.4-2.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #615368,
regarding gcolor2: please use Homepage field to point to upstream homepage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
615368: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615368
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcolor2
Severity: minor
User: [email protected]
Usertags: homepage-field
[ This is an automated bug report, part of the mass bug filing discussed
at <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/02/msg00367.html>. The
submitter is Stefano Zacchiroli, reachable at <[email protected]>. ]
According to lintian, gcolor2 uses its long description
to point to upstream homepage, following an old Developer's Reference
recommendation. That practice has various drawbacks, including the
inability to automatically process homepage information from
package-related services such as packages.d.o, the PTS, etc. Starting
from version 1.14.6, dpkg supports Homepage: as a regular field in
debian/control. You can check Debian Policy § 5.6.23 for more information
<http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Homepage>
Please remove the deprecated pseudo header from the long description of
gcolor2 and turn it into a regular debian/control field.
In case of multiple binary packages, doing so would also allow to factor
out homepage information into the source stanza of debian/control,
instead of repeating it in each binary stanza.
Cheers.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gcolor2
Source-Version: 0.4-2.2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gcolor2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Fernando Ike <[email protected]> (supplier of updated gcolor2 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:48:47 -0400
Source: gcolor2
Binary: gcolor2
Architecture: source
Version: 0.4-2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Carlos C Soto <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Fernando Ike <[email protected]>
Description:
gcolor2 - Simple GTK2 color selector and picker
Closes: 615368 817472
Changes:
gcolor2 (0.4-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Update DH level to 9. (Closes: #817472)
* debian/control:
- Added depends ${misc:Depends}.
- Added Homepage field. (Closes: #615368)
- Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.8
* debian/watch:
- Added watch file.
Checksums-Sha1:
c312c8af0a8d1f1eebf9ee408a522fae5fdbef41 1748 gcolor2_0.4-2.2.dsc
a6bdbab191b9daed2b4f53913e15a54a8fa1db9b 41261 gcolor2_0.4-2.2.diff.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
373d0a1ee90bc8cddd71d42b9990ea043e247c937f5ef478ee29eeb1a7b4e2ca 1748
gcolor2_0.4-2.2.dsc
56bc2463f96cc834c53e9ef50963b7181a8b850a9c4ae026f0042c3165ddeb3e 41261
gcolor2_0.4-2.2.diff.gz
Files:
b4951814ad37538a35961c0869a12557 1748 gnome optional gcolor2_0.4-2.2.dsc
97ea649f64381db5728236e16bd6fbe1 41261 gnome optional gcolor2_0.4-2.2.diff.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=0PGa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
