Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:24:20 -0400
with message-id <2624424.4WIXogZaot@kitterma-e6430>
and subject line Re: RM: python-biom-format [mips powerpc s390x hppa ppc64 
sparc64] -- ROM; Does not build on some architectures due to issue in h5py 
which does not seem to be fixed in sensible time frame
has caused the Debian Bug report #840544,
regarding RM: python-biom-format [mips powerpc s390x hppa ppc64 sparc64] -- 
ROM; Does not build on some architectures due to issue in h5py which does not 
seem to be fixed in sensible time frame
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
840544: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840544
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi ftpmasters,

due to an issue in h5py[1] which does not seem to be fixed in sensible
time frame this package does not build any more on the said
architectures which has lead to #820060.  If the package is removed
from these architectures I could drop the severity of the bug and the
package can at least migrate to testing for all other architectures.

In case this bug report sounds familiar to you:  I reported this in
#837632 but due to a mistake of mine in version 2.1.5+dfsg-4 one binary
package remained at "Architecture: any" instead of specifying the
working architectures.  Sorry for the extra work this created at your
side.

Kind regards

       Andreas.


[1] https://github.com/h5py/h5py/issues/428

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 05:59:27 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi ftpmasters,
> 
> due to an issue in h5py[1] which does not seem to be fixed in sensible
> time frame this package does not build any more on the said
> architectures which has lead to #820060.  If the package is removed
> from these architectures I could drop the severity of the bug and the
> package can at least migrate to testing for all other architectures.
> 
> In case this bug report sounds familiar to you:  I reported this in
> #837632 but due to a mistake of mine in version 2.1.5+dfsg-4 one binary
> package remained at "Architecture: any" instead of specifying the
> working architectures.  Sorry for the extra work this created at your
> side.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>        Andreas.
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/h5py/h5py/issues/428

This seems to have been resolved.

Scott K

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to