Your message dated Mon, 31 Oct 2016 21:14:48 +0200
with message-id <20161031191448.hmide6hys26oucen@exolobe3>
and subject line Re: Bug#678884: (no subject)
has caused the Debian Bug report #678884,
regarding checkpoint on ctrl-c
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
678884: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678884
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: obnam
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: wishlist

It'd be nice if when I ctrl-c a backup, obnam delays to write a
checkpoint, and clear the lock file. AIUI, this is all that's needed to
allow resuming the backup later.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages obnam depends on:
ii  libc6             2.13-32
ii  python            2.7.2-10
ii  python-cliapp     0.29-1
ii  python-larch      0.31-1
ii  python-paramiko   1.7.7.1-2
ii  python-tracing    0.6-2
ii  python-ttystatus  0.18-1
ii  python2.6         2.6.7-4
ii  python2.7         2.7.3~rc2-2.1

obnam recommends no packages.

obnam suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I agree that checkpointing takes long enough that I don't want to do
that when ctrl-c is pressed. Also, to implement that reliably is
rather more tricky than I care for. Thus, I'm closing this wishlist
bug, sorry.

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 05:42:26PM +0200, Damien Couroussé wrote:
> hello,
> 
> I agree that when the user interrupts the backup with ctrl-c, obnam
> should terminate "cleanly"; I mean, without leaving locks.
> 
> However, checkpointing takes a lot of time on slow systems and/or with
> low network bandwidth (several minutes).
> I would prefer just interrupting the backup and removing locks before
> leaving.
> To minimise the amount of data lost in the case of interrupted backup,
> it is possible to configure the checkpoints to be done more often.
> 
> regards,
> Damien

-- 
I want to build worthwhile things that might last. --joeyh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to