Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:42:06 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#787956: raising the severity, prevents usage of the 
multilib packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #787956,
regarding lib32z1-dev: Compiling anything that includes <zlib.h> with -m32 fails
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
787956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lib32z1-dev
Version: 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
Severity: important

lib32z1-dev fails to include zconf.h, which results in compiling
(AFAICT) any zlib-using program to fail:

------------------------------------------------------------
$ cat zlib-32.c 
#include <zlib.h>
$ gcc -m32 -c zlib-32.c 
In file included from zlib-32.c:1:0:
/usr/include/zlib.h:34:19: fatal error: zconf.h: No such file or directory
 #include "zconf.h"
                   ^
compilation terminated.
------------------------------------------------------------

        Sami


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.0.5 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages lib32z1-dev depends on:
ii  lib32z1                      1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
ii  libc6-dev-i386 [lib32c-dev]  2.19-18
ii  zlib1g-dev                   1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1

lib32z1-dev recommends no packages.

lib32z1-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:

> Control: severity -1 serious

This appears to be some random bug that's a user error and should've
been closed after the initial discussion with the submitter (which I'm
now doing).   I'm not sure I can relate it to...

> now that libgphobos, the gdc's D runtime library is built as a shared library,
> I'd like to use the still present multilib builds.  There is currently a
> fall-back to embed the library, but that doesn't sound as clean as using the
> multilib packages.  Dropping the multilib packages isn't yet an option from my
> point of view, because the buildds are not able to depend on other 
> architectures.

...any of this.  Can you please file a new bug that's a bit more
explicit about whatever it is that you're looking for here.  As far as
I can tell this might be a request for multilib packages but zlib
already has multilib packages so I'm pretty confused.

> I'm preparing a NMU for that.

Please allow at least a little time for a response, I've no real idea
what you're even asking for here.

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to