Your message dated Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:56:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341636: dpkg: Provides flag ignored ?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.11.0.1
Severity: important


I try to create a package that would provides another one.
To test the case, you can get a package, change its name and make it
provide the original one.
When my package is created, I try to install it, but I get some
dependency problem : dpkg tell me that the original package can't be
removed since some packages depend on it. But if my new package provides
the original one, I should be able to remove it, isn't it ?



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.2
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)

Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii  coreutils [textutils]         5.93-5     The GNU core utilities
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-8.1  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

dpkg recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:40:16PM +0100, jjluza wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld wrote
> > You are aware of the fact that provides only satisfy unversioned
> > depends?
> >
> > If that is not the problem we would need a more detailed description
> > of it...
> Hmm, old bug, my system has changed since that, so I can't reproduced it 
> anymore.
> I think you can close that bug and I will give you more information later if 
> I 
Closing then.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to