Your message dated Tue, 03 Jan 2017 21:33:38 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#736666: fixed in liblockfile 1.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #736666,
regarding /usr/lib/sm.bin/mail.local: lockmailbox failed code 75 EX_TEMPFAIL
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
736666: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736666
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sendmail-bin
Version: 8.14.4-4
Severity: normal
File: /usr/lib/sm.bin/mail.local


The wheezy mail.local is unable to deliver mail. I was getting syslog
lines like:

Jan 26 07:41:37 bari mail.local[11136]: lockmailbox psz failed; error code 75 
Jan 26 07:41:37 bari sm-mta[11135]: s0PKfb67011134: 
to=<[email protected]>, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, 
mailer=local, pri=30977, dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: local mailer 
(/usr/lib/sm.bin/mail.local) exited with EX_TEMPFAIL

Looking into the problem with strace, I noticed that running mail.local
with "strace -f" allowed it to succeed. A possible workaround is to move
mail.local to some new name and replacing or wrapping it with a script:

#!/bin/bash -
# mail.local fails, but behind strace it works just fine... weird??!!
# Start by doing:
#   mv -i /usr/lib/sm.bin/mail.local /usr/lib/sm.bin/mail.local.REAL
# then create this script in its place.
exec strace -o /dev/null -f /usr/lib/sm.bin/mail.local.REAL "$@"


=====


The following short C code demonstrates the issue.


/*
   Testing with code mimicking sendmail mail.local .
   Compile with
     cc mytest.c -llockfile
   Fails when running "plain" or with strace, but succeeds
   when running with  strace -f  as shown below:
root# ./a.out
lockmailbox psz code 2 errno=1
root# strace -o outx ./a.out
lockmailbox psz code 2 errno=1
root# strace -o outy -f ./a.out
root# 
   Another oddity: in the output of "strace -f" I see
   geteuid32() return 0 within the children (in the execed
   /usr/bin/dotlockfile): should not that return 1001?
*/

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <maillock.h>

int
main(argc, argv)
        int argc;
        char *argv[];
{
        /* name and UID of some plain user */
        char *p         = "psz";
        uid_t uid       = 1001;

        int off;

        /* use a reasonable umask */
        (void) umask(0077);

        /* change UID for quota checks */
        if (setreuid(0, uid) < 0)
        {
                printf("450 setreuid(0, %d) errno=%d (r=%d, e=%d)\n",
                        (int) uid, errno, (int) getuid(), (int) geteuid());
                exit(1);
        }

        if ((off = maillock(p, 15)) != 0)
        {
                printf("lockmailbox %s code %d errno=%d\n", p, off, errno);
        }

        mailunlock();
}


=====

Thanks, Paul

Paul Szabo   [email protected]   http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics   University of Sydney    Australia


-- Package-specific info:
Ouput of /usr/share/bug/sendmail-bin/script:

ls -alR /etc/mail:
/etc/mail:
total 124
drwxr-sr-x   7 smmta smmsp  1024 Jan 23 07:41 .
drwxr-xr-x 172 root  root  10240 Jan 23 11:11 ..
-rwxr-xr--   1 root  smmsp  8043 Jan 23 09:00 Makefile
-rw-------   1 root  root   4261 Jan 22 12:35 access
-rw-r-----   1 smmta smmsp  3072 Dec 22  2009 access.db
-rw-r--r--   1 root  smmsp     0 Dec 22  2009 aliases
-rw-r-----   1 smmta smmsp  3072 Jan 23 07:41 aliases.db
-rw-r--r--   1 root  smmsp  2804 Jan 23 09:00 databases
-rw-r--r--   1 root  root   5657 Jul 17  2008 helpfile
-rw-r--r--   1 root  smmsp    33 Dec 22  2009 local-host-names
drwxr-sr-x   2 smmta smmsp  1024 Dec 22  2009 m4
drwxr-xr-x   2 root  root   1024 Jan 22 12:35 peers
drwxr-xr-x   2 root  smmsp  1024 Jul 16  2008 sasl
-rw-r--r--   1 root  smmsp  9491 Jan 23 07:41 sendmail.cf
-rw-r--r--   1 root  root   8997 Jan 22 12:35 sendmail.cf.old
-rw-r--r--   1 root  root  10032 May  6  2002 sendmail.conf
-rw-r--r--   1 root  smmsp    46 Jan 23 07:41 sendmail.mc
drwxr-sr-x   2 smmta smmsp  1024 Dec 22  2009 smrsh
-rw-r--r--   1 root  smmsp  8844 Jan 23 07:41 submit.cf
-rw-r--r--   1 root  smmsp    55 Jan 22 12:35 submit.cf.errors
-rw-r--r--   1 root  root   8350 Jan 22 12:35 submit.cf.old
-rw-r--r--   1 root  smmsp    59 Jan 23 07:41 submit.mc
drwxr-xr-x   2 smmta smmsp  1024 Dec 22  2009 tls
-rw-r--r--   1 root  smmsp     0 Dec 22  2009 trusted-users

/etc/mail/m4:
total 2
drwxr-sr-x 2 smmta smmsp 1024 Dec 22  2009 .
drwxr-sr-x 7 smmta smmsp 1024 Jan 23 07:41 ..
-rw-r----- 1 root  smmsp    0 Dec 22  2009 dialup.m4
-rw-r----- 1 root  smmsp    0 Dec 22  2009 provider.m4

/etc/mail/peers:
total 2
drwxr-xr-x 2 root  root  1024 Jan 22 12:35 .
drwxr-sr-x 7 smmta smmsp 1024 Jan 23 07:41 ..

/etc/mail/sasl:
total 2
drwxr-xr-x 2 root  smmsp 1024 Jul 16  2008 .
drwxr-sr-x 7 smmta smmsp 1024 Jan 23 07:41 ..

/etc/mail/smrsh:
total 2
drwxr-sr-x 2 smmta smmsp 1024 Dec 22  2009 .
drwxr-sr-x 7 smmta smmsp 1024 Jan 23 07:41 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root  smmsp   26 Dec 22  2009 mail.local -> 
/usr/lib/sm.bin/mail.local
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root  smmsp   17 Dec 22  2009 procmail -> /usr/bin/procmail
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root  smmsp   17 Dec 22  2009 vacation -> /usr/bin/vacation

/etc/mail/tls:
total 23
drwxr-xr-x 2 smmta smmsp 1024 Dec 22  2009 .
drwxr-sr-x 7 smmta smmsp 1024 Jan 23 07:41 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root  root     7 Dec 22  2009 no_prompt
-rw------- 1 root  root  1191 Dec 22  2009 sendmail-client.cfg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root  smmsp 1249 Dec 22  2009 sendmail-client.crt
-rw------- 1 root  root  1025 Dec 22  2009 sendmail-client.csr
-rw-r----- 1 root  smmsp 1675 Dec 22  2009 sendmail-common.key
-rw-r----- 1 root  smmsp 1582 Dec 22  2009 sendmail-common.prm
-rw------- 1 root  root  1191 Dec 22  2009 sendmail-server.cfg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root  smmsp 1249 Dec 22  2009 sendmail-server.crt
-rw------- 1 root  root  1025 Dec 22  2009 sendmail-server.csr
-rwxr--r-- 1 root  root  3260 Jan 22 12:35 starttls.m4

sendmail.conf:
DAEMON_MODE="Daemon";
DAEMON_PARMS="";
DAEMON_HOSTSTATS="Yes";
DAEMON_MAILSTATS="No";
QUEUE_MODE="${DAEMON_MODE}";
QUEUE_INTERVAL="10";
QUEUE_PARMS="";
MSP_MODE="${QUEUE_MODE}";
MSP_INTERVAL="${QUEUE_INTERVAL}";
MSP_PARMS="${QUEUE_PARMS}";
MSP_MAILSTATS="No";
MISC_PARMS="";
CRON_MAILTO="root";
CRON_PARMS="";
AGE_DATA="";
DAEMON_STATS="${DAEMON_MAILSTATS}";
MSP_STATS="${MSP_MAILSTATS}";


sendmail.mc:
[trigger for usr/share/sendmail/sm_helper.sh]

submit.mc...
FEATURE(`msp [trigger for usr/share/sendmail/sm_helper.sh]


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.51-pk06.21-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages sendmail-bin depends on:
ii  libc6          2.13-38
ii  libdb5.1       5.1.29-5
ii  libldap-2.4-2  2.4.31-1+nmu2
ii  liblockfile1   1.09-5
ii  libsasl2-2     2.1.25.dfsg1-6+deb7u1
ii  libssl1.0.0    1.0.1e-2+deb7u3
ii  libwrap0       7.6.q-24
ii  procps         1:3.3.3-3
ii  sendmail-base  8.14.4-4
ii  sendmail-cf    8.14.4-4

sendmail-bin recommends no packages.

Versions of packages sendmail-bin suggests:
ii  libsasl2-modules  2.1.25.dfsg1-6+deb7u1
ii  openssl           1.0.1e-2+deb7u3
pn  sasl2-bin         <none>
ii  sendmail-doc      8.14.4-4

Versions of packages sensible-mda depends on:
ii  libc6     2.13-38
ii  procmail  3.22-20

Versions of packages rmail depends on:
ii  libc6          2.13-38
ii  libldap-2.4-2  2.4.31-1+nmu2

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/init.d/sendmail changed [not included]

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: liblockfile
Source-Version: 1.11-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
liblockfile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Miquel van Smoorenburg <[email protected]> (supplier of updated liblockfile 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:46:41 +0100
Source: liblockfile
Binary: liblockfile1 liblockfile-bin liblockfile-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Miquel van Smoorenburg <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Miquel van Smoorenburg <[email protected]>
Description:
 liblockfile-bin - support binaries for and cli utilities based on liblockfile
 liblockfile-dev - Development library for liblockfile
 liblockfile1 - NFS-safe locking library
Closes: 41791 736666
Changes:
 liblockfile (1.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * new upstream version
   * use geteuid() instead of getuid() to find out mailboxname
     (closes: #736666)
   * add dotlockfile <lockfile> cmd args... functionality
     (closes: #41791)
Checksums-Sha1:
 0c8e1b662a51ef9985b5370cf57d105861586f75 1961 liblockfile_1.11-1.dsc
 64072c3c3a361f28582266a2df5e2f3280556b45 67014 liblockfile_1.11.orig.tar.gz
 61c54f7c16c0eafb723c42bbbba31662aacec0f1 5811 liblockfile_1.11-1.debian.tar.bz2
 df440cc7bde650796be5f3e9fad72f164074ffdd 14994 liblockfile1_1.11-1_amd64.deb
 3d0ecbb10716bd67467a624271edbafae0514dda 17924 liblockfile-bin_1.11-1_amd64.deb
 04f2777bed5603cebad452600ab88637f374c125 19054 liblockfile-dev_1.11-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 52325979396129348f3445ae6062e34b3c5f864e60b552873c2fddd0fdeedf23 1961 
liblockfile_1.11-1.dsc
 68e2a0ef8c2385419995a6113cb625c7c17d460491c862672d9290ecd660a8d0 67014 
liblockfile_1.11.orig.tar.gz
 0eec76df07d620d5e99e5045e5f7de2d390c8de86ed0d41adf7006cf9369c352 5811 
liblockfile_1.11-1.debian.tar.bz2
 2487cd840de35326a4655de6dbffc537f2355ac7fd409ad9f5b4de4b100a14f0 14994 
liblockfile1_1.11-1_amd64.deb
 6f78582c187bd8cc25addcb0383949141cc8b7926708bf6cf33efd56696a6412 17924 
liblockfile-bin_1.11-1_amd64.deb
 4a55378c6cd6d74cbe38ad8c0ee7d63fb328b9e01452b9bd35b7c98bef348008 19054 
liblockfile-dev_1.11-1_amd64.deb
Files:
 06c6a85dc2c63b8797a8ff8fc7596dfd 1961 devel standard liblockfile_1.11-1.dsc
 6b62198e92ab0f13e11f363cdd60744f 67014 devel standard 
liblockfile_1.11.orig.tar.gz
 7491b86673cbaa2c2bda0835d3ac6baf 5811 devel standard 
liblockfile_1.11-1.debian.tar.bz2
 b17e34bdacb37a3442e2a74b70f31a0f 14994 libs standard 
liblockfile1_1.11-1_amd64.deb
 adedce2a043a7a9b7a098c3980a7d85e 17924 utils standard 
liblockfile-bin_1.11-1_amd64.deb
 2c15c92606cbbd8bc0ad242d4e4a0c9b 19054 libdevel optional 
liblockfile-dev_1.11-1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=CO8h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to