Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2017 09:54:54 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#660702: git-buildpackage: support other build places
besides /var/cache/pbuilder
has caused the Debian Bug report #660702,
regarding git-buildpackage: support other build places besides
/var/cache/pbuilder
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
660702: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660702
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.5.10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I find that my /var is too much space-constrained, and would like to use
a different place to build at. Unfortunately, paths are largely
hardwired into the system, but here's a patch to start changing that.
It honors the BASEDIR variable, if set in /etc/pbuilderrc.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,
'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.1-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages git-buildpackage depends on:
ii devscripts 2.10.69+squeeze2 scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii git [git-core] 1:1.7.2.5-3 fast, scalable, distributed revisi
ii git-core 1:1.7.2.5-3 fast, scalable, distributed revisi
ii python 2.6.6-3+squeeze6 interactive high-level object-orie
ii python-dateutil 1.4.1-3 powerful extensions to the standar
ii python-support 1.0.10 automated rebuilding support for P
Versions of packages git-buildpackage recommends:
ii cowbuilder 0.62+nmu2 pbuilder running on cowdancer
ii pristine-tar 1.03 regenerate pristine tarballs
Versions of packages git-buildpackage suggests:
ii git-load-dirs 1.1.8 Import upstream archives into git
-- no debconf information
-- debsums errors found:
debsums: changed file /usr/bin/git-pbuilder (from git-buildpackage package)
--- git-pbuilder.orig 2010-09-27 09:42:23.000000000 +0200
+++ git-pbuilder 2012-02-21 00:15:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -25,7 +25,11 @@
# The root directory where different cowbuilder --basepath directories are
# found. git-pbuilder expects them to be named base-<dist>.cow.
-COWBUILDER_BASE=/var/cache/pbuilder
+if [ -f /etc/pbuilderrc ]; then
+ source /etc/pbuilderrc
+fi
+COWBUILDER_BASE=${BASEDIR:-/var/cache/pbuilder}
+
# Make sure we have the necessary tools
if [ ! -x /usr/sbin/cowbuilder ]; then
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Toni
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:41:11AM +0100, Toni Müller wrote:
> On 02/21/2012 10:38 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 03:36:08PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> The current version does honor COWBUILDER_BASE if it's already set in the
> >> environment.
>
> Looks like I would at least need to enable that in the sudoers file.
>
> > I'm inclined to close this one since GIT_PBUILDER_AUTOCONF is there. Do
> > you both agree?
>
> I'm unsure about what setting GIT_PBUILDER_AUTOCONF actually means. The
> docs mumble something about things I would lose, but leave it at that.
>
> It would be nice if you could leave the bug open for some days, so I can
> (hopefully) try those alternative paths and see how far I get.
I think the "few days" have passed. In case you still have issues please
reopen.
Cheers,
-- Guido
--- End Message ---
