Your message dated Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:36:10 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gtklp: closing old (approx. > 2 years) bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtklp
Version: 0.9f-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
it seems gtklp{,q} can act as lpr/lprm/lpq replacements when called
accordingly. It would be very nice when the package would support this
by using the alternatives system (in this case the lpr{,ng} maintainers
would have to aggree to add alternatives for these programs).
Another (not that nice) alternative would be to conflict on lpr{,ng} and
simply ship the links in the package.
Regards,
-- Guido
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bogon 2.4.18-bogon #1 Son Mai 19 19:04:57 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages gtklp depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcupsys2 1.1.14-3 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) -
ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-4 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-11 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii xlibs 4.1.0-16 X Window System client libraries
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Package: gtklp
Version: 1.1.0-2
Hi everybody,
Earlier I have emailed you regarding the current status of the open bugs
in gtklp, in particular if you were still experiencing the old bugs in
the newest version (at the time of the mail, 1.1.0-1 ; 1.1.0-2 is now
the current version in etch.)
These bugs no longer exist in my testing of the latest package (with the
exception of #163306 , being part of the wishlist.) However, I have not
heard from any of you to verify this claim, so I'm now closing these
bugs. If you feel that this is not the case, please reopen the
appropriate bug and followup with the reason(s) for reopening. I would
very much appreciate patches or even hints to properly fix these bugs
too. ;-)
Cheers,
Zakame
- --
Zak B. Elep || http://zakame.spunge.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD/IAPV4ex/fpThR0RAoSwAJ0aVoQXdi+ffCYmqGhcHbsmpls9XQCdHfJ1
LajFILZ53XB16FQSaTXlcgw=
=N2wZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
